TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Strategy for EU bootstrapping hardware startups: Don't sell to anyone in EU

14 点作者 zkirill10 个月前

3 条评论

Tomte10 个月前
You&#x27;re deeply confused about CE (also in <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40848745">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40848745</a>).<p>CE is not a certification or a test, it&#x27;s a self declaration.<p>You declare to be compliant with all relevant European regulations by marking your product CE. You could even mark your product CE without doing any tests, if you&#x27;re very confident.<p>You also decide what tests you need to run, which of them to run in-house, and which of them to outsource.<p>You decide whether or not to trust components&#x27; CE marks. Or maybe retest them. It&#x27;s your decision, you&#x27;re liable for everything in your product.<p>Now, why are Chinese companies so cheap? Maybe they are very cost-efficient. Maybe they don&#x27;t really test at all and just send you a fake report. Maybe they test only a small sliver of relevant things. Who knows?<p>The thing is: unless you know what you need to feel good about your product, price-shopping is senseless.
评论 #40897077 未加载
micw10 个月前
Usually you do pre-tests before doing the expensive ones.<p>Recently on HN was a link to <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nutsvolts.com&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;article&#x2F;low-cost-emi-pre-compliance-testing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nutsvolts.com&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;article&#x2F;low-cost-emi-pre-...</a> that allows you to do your own pre-tests.<p>Also there are companies to do these pre-test measurements as a service which has the same result but is _way_ cheaper than a &quot;certification&quot; test.
koollman10 个月前
It is easier to sell crap in markets with no customer protection or safety rules.<p>It is cheaper to make stuff without regulations or worker rights.<p>But, well, that&#x27;s not really the point you want to make, is it ? :)