TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The license does not indicate which Bible is to be used

13 点作者 shantnutiwari10 个月前

3 条评论

kozak10 个月前
This is a self-destructive license: prohibition of use for "warfare" and "weapons manufacturing" basically means that the author wants the world to be conquered by whatever bad guy is stronger. At which point it will be impossible for the license to work because there will be no effective rule of law.
vdqtp310 个月前
Interesting that weapons manufacturing is prohibited, despite the Bible having no prohibitions against weapons, in fact much the opposite. David, a man after God&#x27;s own heart, was armed from a young age and used his sling in one-on-one combat despite not being a soldier.<p>And in the words of Jesus in Luke 22:36 - Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.<p>This seems more like a license to govern what this person thinks the Bible says, rather than what it does say.
评论 #40928668 未加载
scj10 个月前
&quot;A male must be circumcised in order to enter into this covenant.&quot;