TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

SpaceX's unmatched streak of perfection with the Falcon 9 rocket is over

88 点作者 makaimc11 个月前

11 条评论

JumpCrisscross11 个月前
Modern rocketry is somewhere between WWI and WWII aviation. We’re beginning to mass manufacture, but the leading edge advances so quickly that learning curves have limited runtime. Alongside new designs, new materials are being invented and deployed across America and China (and to a limited degree Europe.)<p>Most importantly, we can tune risk and and reward across the production line; the crewed Falcon 9&#x2F;Dragon launches are <i>far</i> more conservative than their Starlink + rideshare ones.
评论 #40944868 未加载
评论 #40945030 未加载
评论 #40945275 未加载
trompetenaccoun11 个月前
Tangentially related: Most journalists - especially in tech these days - seem to be doing practically no original or investigative work and simply rehash what they read on Twitter &amp; co. Are there any decent apps that do the same thing? For example I&#x27;d like to say &quot;Follow everything SpaceX-related from these primary sources and give me regular updates&#x2F;summaries&quot;. I don&#x27;t care to read people&#x27;s opinions on it, just the aggregated raw info would be nice.
评论 #40944950 未加载
评论 #40945078 未加载
评论 #40944899 未加载
评论 #40945324 未加载
评论 #40945266 未加载
评论 #40944944 未加载
评论 #40944860 未加载
评论 #40945270 未加载
bell-cot11 个月前
&gt; A few minutes after liftoff of SpaceX&#x27;s Starlink 9-3 mission, veteran observers of SpaceX launches noticed an unusual build-up of ice around the top of the Merlin Vacuum engine, which consumes a propellant mixture of super-chilled kerosene and cryogenic liquid oxygen. [...]<p>&gt; Numerous chunks of ice fell away from the rocket as the upper stage engine powered into orbit, but the Merlin Vacuum, or M-Vac, engine appeared to complete its first burn as planned. A leak in the oxidizer system or a problem with insulation could lead to ice accumulation, although the exact cause, and its possible link to the engine malfunction later in flight, will be the focus of SpaceX&#x27;s investigation into the failure.<p>&gt; A second burn with the upper stage engine was supposed to raise the perigee, or low point, of the rocket&#x27;s orbit well above the atmosphere before releasing 20 Starlink satellites [...].<p>&gt; &quot;Upper stage restart to raise perigee resulted in an engine RUD for reasons currently unknown,&quot; Musk wrote...<p>For Falcon 9 <i>manned</i> launches, there are a whole series of abort modes and we-didn&#x27;t-get-to-orbit splashdown locations:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nasaspaceflight.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;05&#x2F;examining-crew-dragons-launch-abort-modes-and-splashdown-locations&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nasaspaceflight.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;05&#x2F;examining-crew-drago...</a><p>It&#x27;d be interesting to know where in this mission&#x27;s flight profile, <i>if</i> it had been manned, the launch director would have ordered an abort. That LOX leaks often lead to explosions is Rocket Science 101.
评论 #40945466 未加载
LorenDB11 个月前
300+ successful launches in an 8-year span is incredible.
jtwaleson11 个月前
I&#x27;d argue that going for 0 failures in virtually any domain will lead to inefficiency. You need some failures to get the feedback that you&#x27;ve &quot;under-engineered&quot; something. Without failures, you can guarantee that you&#x27;ve over-engineered it.<p>In a similar vein, I think proper risk acceptance policies shouldn&#x27;t say &quot;security&#x2F;safety is our #1 priority&quot;, just like a good SLA doesn&#x27;t guarantee 100% uptime. When you set a 99.9% uptime SLA, make sure you&#x27;re actually down sometimes. When you want efficient rockets, you have to see some of them crash.
zitterbewegung11 个月前
It doesn’t take rocket science to understand that rockets eventually have a success rate of less than 100% . (Edited changed failure rate to success from child comment)
评论 #40944850 未加载
评论 #40944879 未加载
评论 #40945349 未加载
jmdeschamps11 个月前
Still unmatched, even if imperfect...
patrickwalton11 个月前
Amazing to me that it&#x27;s <i>not</i> the reused element that failed. It&#x27;s as though re-flying hardware that&#x27;s already proven to work is more reliable!
m2fkxy11 个月前
bad week for upper stage engines!
评论 #40944735 未加载
seydor11 个月前
well i know ars is not using chatGPT because of the grammatical errors
评论 #40945018 未加载
sidcool11 个月前
Such a bad title to a story. &quot;over&quot; means they will never be able to create that streak again.
评论 #40945011 未加载
评论 #40944891 未加载
评论 #40945865 未加载