TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Tech, Crunched: How the go-to site for startup news lost its way

110 点作者 jdbiggs10 个月前

15 条评论

julianeon10 个月前
This article makes a great point towards the end that I&#x27;ll repeat here:<p>There should be another TC-like site reporting on startups now. Specifically there should be a news site about startups that has some critical distance from those startups - at least enough that it doesn&#x27;t directly financially benefit from my perception of the companies that it&#x27;s reporting on.<p>Example, by analogy: I&#x27;m interested in news about Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Google, Meta. But I don&#x27;t want to read their PR releases. I want someone to do some filtering on that, because there&#x27;s too much filler there for me to review it daily.<p>This seems to be a really hard thing to do right! There&#x27;s a balance in the reporting that it takes a lot of intelligence and finesse to do right, which is why it seems media co&#x27;s can&#x27;t do it forever.<p>One issue is that it can be too adversarial and too clickbait-y. That is a problem.<p>But the other issue - and this is the problem afflicting the solutions that I&#x27;ve seen - is the opposite. Too far in the pocket of the companies it&#x27;s reporting on, and friendly to the point of sleepiness, like sitting in on all-hands you&#x27;re not being paid to attend. A news site that might as well be called &quot;our venture fund and why the companies we invest in are awesome&quot; isn&#x27;t it.<p>I don&#x27;t think there&#x27;s a site filling this void right now. TC did a decent job at it, for a while, but there should be a new contender.
评论 #40971207 未加载
评论 #40971198 未加载
评论 #40971320 未加载
mudil10 个月前
Speaking as an MD, as someone who founded a medical technology blog in 2004, and closed it this year.<p>Not only TC collapsed but the whole blogosphere collapsed. The independent journalism has collapsed.<p>When Google and others take your content, crawl your site, store your data, use it and resuse it to serve targeted ads on memes, the journalism becomes a useless pursuit without salary. Google destroyed the internet.<p>It&#x27;s a tragedy for whole society.
评论 #40970831 未加载
评论 #40970837 未加载
评论 #40970899 未加载
评论 #40970794 未加载
评论 #40970806 未加载
marban10 个月前
You could say that about any tech blog of that era—RRW, Mashable, GigaOm, etc. The point is that tech has thankfully grown up, and they lost it to Bloomberg, NYT, FT, et al.
评论 #40970341 未加载
karaterobot10 个月前
&gt; But in the end, TC is no longer relevant... Here’s the saddest thing: it should be. Startups haven’t gone away. Any media startup could essentially recreate Arrington’s model and start selling little ads while profiling startups. Fun can be had poking holes in Valley blowhards, and there could be reams of content to be had by telling people how to be successful in startup land. But TC won’t do that anymore.<p>The author seems nostalgic for the good old days, when TechCrunch was a real news outlet that spoke truth to power, and so on. I guess I only ever remember it as a blog that was close enough to Silicon Valley to act as a hype lever, multiplying the force of hype for the latest Silicon Valley horseshit by broadcasting it to the world. The article confirms that was at least <i>part</i> of what they did, but I guess he believes they also did some good things. I wasn&#x27;t ever a regular reader, and may have that wrong.
评论 #40970372 未加载
评论 #40970661 未加载
评论 #40970291 未加载
renewiltord10 个月前
They still have a lot of market power. To get placed in them you need to go through a marketer with contacts and that costs quite a bit of money. They publish all this junk stuff but it&#x27;s just to get more eyeballs. Centralization of this stuff means that these gatekeepers become more valuable. A real pity.
评论 #40970296 未加载
nuz10 个月前
I&#x27;d like to continue on the narrative here but the truth is kind of that tech itself hasn&#x27;t really had much exciting things to report on in the ~2017 to now period. If I were in their shoes I&#x27;d probably switch reporting to anti tech as well.
评论 #40970799 未加载
评论 #40970735 未加载
swyx10 个月前
DEI &#x2F; MEI culture war aside:<p>&gt; After years of corporate ownership, culminating in Yahoo’s sale to private equity firm Apollo, TC has become a milquetoast site focused on big raises specially placed by expensive PR people and random tech news that has been neutered into pablum. The current editorial structure, controlled by one or two old-guard TCers and a lot of older editors hired by editor Connie Loizos.<p>sad to realize that this is exactly what i was feeling about TC in the last 3-4 years. is it salvageable?
评论 #40970695 未加载
评论 #40970597 未加载
ilamont10 个月前
<i>Legend has it that at one point an irate German entrepreneur spit on Mike at an event, leading us all to have a profound distrust of humanity.</i><p>This wasn&#x27;t a legend. Arrington talked or wrote about it, I can&#x27;t remember where. Maybe in one of his essays explaining why he was going to Hawaii to take a months-long break. He said he was at a conference and someone came up to him and spit in his face, and then walked away without saying a word. As I recall, he regarded the incident as a turning point that prompted soul-searching about what he was doing.<p><i>Traffic was paramount and ad sales were vital, so niche startup posts, posts that everyone once read but were now read by the company, lost their value. Over time, the value of a traditional TC story waned.</i><p>Nearly every newsroom has struggled with this for more than 15 years. The only media orgs that have been able to escape or partially escape the black hole of clickbait are by massive scale&#x2F;subscriber counts (NYT, FT) or those funded by sales at some other profitable branch of the company, such as Bloomberg (terminals).
PeterCorless10 个月前
If there was one thing the article was missing, it was to differentiate the power of something data-driven like Crunchbase versus the articular content of TechCrunch.
jrhizor10 个月前
It looks like Michael Arrington agrees <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;arrington&#x2F;status&#x2F;1812902866899902857" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;arrington&#x2F;status&#x2F;1812902866899902857</a>
znq10 个月前
Curious, what are good alternatives to what TC used to be?
wallflower10 个月前
Wow! Techmeme is still around!<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techmeme.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techmeme.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #40970511 未加载
评论 #40970351 未加载
BenoitP10 个月前
Ah the good old days of Michael Arrington. TC was my gateway drug to silicon valley produced news, including HN.<p>He had the habits of pulling stunts like showing up at meetings he wasn&#x27;t invited to. And the ways of a savant lawyer at extracting information from people. I&#x27;ve always suspected he knew well in advance about the iPad; and he convinced investors to back him up to produce an equivalent product, partnering with a laptop company. The product got shipped, only just at 8-10 times the weight of the iPad though.<p>He&#x27;d have made a fantastic COO, or investor relationship manager IMHO if he had not chosen to do TechCrunch. I hope he&#x27;s doing well at his cryptofund.
TruthWillHurt10 个月前
For a moment I thought it was about HN.. for some reason.
评论 #40970834 未加载
brigadier13210 个月前
&gt; White dude CEOs like Brian Armstrong and Jesse Powell came out hard against DEI efforts and even paid employees to leave, which led, incidentally, to morale at their companies so low it could be measured in millisieverts. But they were making money, baby, so it was all good.<p>&gt; So, by all measures, Alexandr Wang’s MEI bullshit was just that, bullshit<p>Amazing, I don&#x27;t think he gets it. His rant about white dudes while the person being critiqued is an Asian dude. You don&#x27;t have to think hard about why Asian people might value merit in a system that previously penalized them for their race?<p>&gt; Haje argued that Wang was a wang.<p>Comments like this really highlight the hypocrisy and lack of actual principle behind the stances of these people.
评论 #40970785 未加载
评论 #40970614 未加载
评论 #40970767 未加载
评论 #40970804 未加载
评论 #40970944 未加载