TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Dirty diaper resold on Amazon ruined a family business

29 点作者 arittr10 个月前

4 条评论

lastofthemojito10 个月前
&gt; Amazon says that it prohibits negative reviews that violate community guidelines, including by focusing on seller, order, or shipping feedback rather than on the item&#x27;s quality.<p>I&#x27;ve always really disliked this policy, especially on items that are shipped by the seller instead of fulfilled from Amazon. Say you want to buy some of those Japanese Kit Kats that come in unusual flavors (at least to the American palate). Feedback that candy from Seller A arrived stale or melted and that candy from Seller B arrived in great shape would be helpful. I don&#x27;t need yet more reviews of the product in the abstract, I need information about what condition it will be in when it arrives at my door, and seller practices can absolutely influence that.
评论 #40970498 未加载
dbg3141510 个月前
Amazon is really broken. (Yelp too for that matter.)<p>They don&#x27;t force customers to update the product when the manufacturing or size of the products change. So you&#x27;ll get a &quot;buy it again!&quot; but it&#x27;s fundamentally not the product you purchased.<p>And a company can sell something &quot;good&quot; for a few months, and offer rewards &#x2F; incentives to give good reviews, then use those reviews for the &quot;old&quot; product to sell a revised and &quot;junk&quot; version. Shrinkflation is so real.<p>Companies are free to use Prime to for delivery, but their own processes for returns. &quot;Oh, I have to spend $56 to ship something using DHL over-night now because that&#x27;s the only delivery method the seller accepts for returns? Uh...&quot;<p>Making sure when you see a &quot;Prime&quot; logo, it also means Prime Returns -- like the drop off at Whole Foods style free returns policy.<p>Also... there&#x27;s like no real way to talk to a human when you have a real issue with a seller.<p>Reviews seem... less than honest a lot of the time. Looking at pictures, it&#x27;s often &quot;old&quot; versions of the product at this point. And there are a bunch of settings for reviews, so ratings could be on the &quot;group of products&quot; rather than the specific product you&#x27;re ordering. Like, &quot;Oh this is all tennis shoes we sell, not the shoes you ordered.&quot;<p>Anyway, some simple tools would really help... like giving consumers the ability to filter reviews based on when the reviews were created. &quot;Only show me products with 100 reviews in the last week... then sort by customer review rating.&quot; Or, &quot;For the rating, only count reviews from my country buyers from the last month.&quot; Stuff like that would be easy to do with the data they have, and would help reduce scammer-sellers.<p>Recently I bought a little sensor for my AC system... turns out I didn&#x27;t need it, so I went to return it. I hadn&#x27;t opened it. The seller told me I had literally 3 days to get it back to them... and told me that I had to send it a certain shipping method... and then when I did, they refused to give a refund because they said I had opened the box. For proof, they had opened the box and took a picture of the item open.<p>So I got to pay for the item, and pay $56 shipping, only to not get a refund. Amazon closed the case without ever letting me talk to a human. Shady.
micromacrofoot10 个月前
&gt; Amazon says that it prohibits negative reviews that violate community guidelines, including by focusing on seller, order, or shipping feedback rather than on the item&#x27;s quality.<p>You&#x27;d think they&#x27;d try to use AI to flag this stuff instead of whatever the hell their current chatbot is supposed to be for — I still regularly see &quot;product damaged in shipping&quot; 1-star reviews<p>Additionally, anyone that&#x27;s regularly tried to order &quot;open box&quot; from &quot;Amazon Warehouse&quot; to save a few bucks can probably speak to the inaccuracies of the return process... it&#x27;s pretty common to get broken (or completely mislabeled) goods from this program.
评论 #40970187 未加载
评论 #41074709 未加载
unyttigfjelltol10 个月前
I often select Amazon warehouse or refurbished items (don&#x27;t recall precise wording) and from experience, the quality often is surprisingly shabby, or put differently, that category of merchendise is substantially <i>under</i>-discounted. Metal supports bent, components missing, protective packaging conspicuously breached or smashed. I found this article insightful as it tends to explain the processes that lead to such items being listed as if they are undamaged, conforming and nearly-new. At this point I assume products distributed in that channel are significantly defective albeit probably functional with some effort.