Spartan article. I was curious about the efficiency. Seems like it's theorized as high as 30, but practically is more in line with 20 year old heat pumps? Lots of articles about simulations.<p>> COP of 3.7<p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-43611-6" rel="nofollow">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-43611-6</a> (2023)<p>> Using elastocaloric systems, these efficiencies can be increased by a multiple. Elastocaloric materials show COPs of up to over 30, and current technology demonstrators achieve simulative efficiencies of over 9.<p><a href="https://analyticalscience.wiley.com/content/article-do/elastocalorics-cool-into-future" rel="nofollow">https://analyticalscience.wiley.com/content/article-do/elast...</a> (2023)<p>Looking for articles by the interviewee, Google Scholar only lists six. This one has a COP study:<p><a href="https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/SMASIS/proceedings-abstract/SMASIS2023/87523/1171065" rel="nofollow">https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/SMASIS/proceedings-ab...</a><p>The 20 COP is at temp. diff of around 3 K. At 20 K diff, the COP seems to land around 3-4.<p>> "The efficiency of elastocaloric materials is more than ten times higher than today’s air conditioning or heating systems – they will require significantly less electricity,” said Motzki.<p>Please also explain what's wrong with existing technologies that makes NiTi relevant in residential buildings. Current numbers don't seem to say what you're saying.<p>I could see this being <i>really</i> useful in e.g. space exploration where you don't want liquids slushing around, or risk leaking gas.