TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Zettlr: One-Stop Publication Workbench

129 点作者 hgyjnbdet10 个月前

11 条评论

treetalker10 个月前
I think it’s trying to be a markdown-based Obsidian&#x2F;Logseq zettelkasten with built-in support for (1) interfacing with reference managers and (2) exporting&#x2F;publishing with LaTeX&#x2F;pandoc.<p>If you want to see it and get an idea about what it does and how it’s supposed to be used, go here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.zettlr.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;core&#x2F;user-interface&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.zettlr.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;core&#x2F;user-interface&#x2F;</a><p>Finding that information took some digging — although there is a visual on the homepage after scrolling several screens down (at least on mobile).<p>Constructive feedback for the team: I find the website and documentation difficult to use because they present details first and main ideas later. See if you can put the bottom line on the top line.<p>Also, as I navigated through the site, every time I followed a link I got asked, again and again, whether I wanted to opt out of cookies and data collection. Answering once should be enough.
评论 #41025279 未加载
throwaway21110 个月前
I ended up on Zettlr after a long search for a note taking application that would allow not only easy note taking but retrieval and linking as part of the process of creating larger rigorous documents. I especially wanted something that wasn&#x27;t about a gimmick, was operable without a cloud, was reliable, and was open source. I&#x27;ve found Zettlr wonderful for personal note taking, academic note taking, and putting that together in creating academic and professional use papers.<p>For me: It fits the Zettlekasten method as far as I want to take that. However the tools in doing to don&#x27;t impose that. Tools I like in particular:<p>Configurable left pane with files and folders similar to a code editor like VSCodium or SublimeText.<p>Quasi WYSIWYG markdown. It helps, especially for things like quotes.<p>Inline tags, inline references via linked bibtex (for me, from Jabref), timestamps.<p>Another pane on the right I configured summarising links, references. These panes can be hidden for full screen editing too.<p>Exports in a wide range of formats.<p>Zettlr facilitates the creation of knowledge better than any other note taking application I&#x27;ve tried. On top of that, it&#x27;s open source.<p>Apologies in advance if this sounds like an ad. I have no affiliation with the project other than as a user.
kvmet10 个月前
I use Zettlr somewhat often. Honestly my favorite features are just:<p>- inline markdown preview<p>- VIM Keybinds (with some issues, as many implementations have)<p>- mermaid and LaTeX math support built in<p>(Notice that 2&#x2F;3 of these are easily done on many other editors via plugins&#x2F;extensions)<p>It has some other nice things too but I find it to be kind of slow and clunky. Still I come back for the way markdown works there because it feels like WYSIWYG but without so much mouse clicking. I have minimally used the pandoc and other publishing features but wasn&#x27;t blown away by them vs just using pandoc
karencarits10 个月前
I have tried Zettlr, but would recommend other solutions for academic writing. For example:<p>* Manubot: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;manubot.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;manubot.org&#x2F;</a> - Demo: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;trangdata.github.io&#x2F;treeheatr-manuscript&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;trangdata.github.io&#x2F;treeheatr-manuscript&#x2F;</a><p>* Quarto: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;quarto.org&#x2F;docs&#x2F;manuscripts&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;quarto.org&#x2F;docs&#x2F;manuscripts&#x2F;</a> - Demo: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;quarto-ext.github.io&#x2F;manuscript-template-jupyter&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;quarto-ext.github.io&#x2F;manuscript-template-jupyter&#x2F;</a><p>Pandoc and git are powerful tools that I think may improve scientific research, but there are some obstacles before these can replace word
jzb10 个月前
I&#x27;m trying this out on Linux but for the life of me I can&#x27;t get the split window stuff to work. The Flatpak for some reason wouldn&#x27;t even open files - but the Debian package seems to work fine.
评论 #41028666 未加载
torontopizza10 个月前
Does anyone else judge these knowledge engine tools on whether or not they generate their own static docs?<p>Please reply links here for some nice zettlr-generated static sites :)
评论 #41029549 未加载
jxy10 个月前
I was trying this for a while, but the inability of labeling and refering to specific math equations became a deal breaker.
评论 #41028263 未加载
LennyHenrysNuts10 个月前
Seems like it&#x27;s doing what I&#x27;ve been doing with org-mode for years.
评论 #41032548 未加载
评论 #41033450 未加载
wiradikusuma10 个月前
From quick glance it&#x27;s like open source scrivener?
1oooqooq10 个月前
grammarly but local? given that grammarly started way before heavy llms, i assume there&#x27;s none of that here also?
评论 #41023815 未加载
marban10 个月前
What makes it better than iA Writer?
评论 #41025009 未加载