TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google reported a 13% increase in its emissions footprint in 2023

51 点作者 methuselah_in10 个月前

6 条评论

bamboozled10 个月前
<i>Other estimates suggest that the large scale deployment of AI could help in significant reductions of emissions globally. A recent study by the Boston Consulting Group found that application of AI to corporate and industrial practices could result in a 5-10% reduction in global emissions by 2030, while generating a value worth $1.3 trillion to $2.6 trillion through additional revenues or cost savings.</i><p>Prediction, the emissions will only be additive. More things to consume basically. I hope I am wrong.
评论 #41086569 未加载
评论 #41086576 未加载
评论 #41086730 未加载
PreInternet0110 个月前
To put this in perspective: for CO2 emissions (which is what we&#x27;re talking about here, I guess?), you have the Big Four, in descending order of pollution: transportation, electricity, industry and other (mostly commercial&#x2F;residential), for a total of about 65 Billion Metric Tons of CO2 per year.<p>In transportation, the biggest polluter (by direct emissions) by far is shipping. This is about 8&#x2F;65 (12%), compared to 1&#x2F;65 (1.5%) for the much-maligned aviation sector, or the 4&#x2F;65 (6%) for cars, that, for some reason, nobody likes to talk about.<p>Then, when it comes to electricity, data centers are really quite marginal: 0.4&#x2F;65 (about 0.6%). And, like aviation, the sector is taking measures to Be Better: higher airco setpoints, mandatory purchase of &quot;green&quot; electricity, etc. etc. Unlike the shipping sector, which pretty much continues to burn raw dinosaurs just because they&#x27;re based in a jurisdiction that allows, nay, <i>encourages</i> that.<p>So, if you want to get mad about emissions, start with things that actually matter, would be my take? I happen to be of the opinion that AI is bunk, and any energy invested in it is wasted, but that goes doubly or triply for the shipment of novelty hats...
评论 #41087123 未加载
评论 #41087184 未加载
评论 #41086833 未加载
评论 #41087022 未加载
ChrisArchitect10 个月前
[dupe]<p>Lots of discussion a month ago:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40859993">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=40859993</a>
bananapub10 个月前
does anyone know if this is a regression of Urs&#x27; promises, or is it just that &lt; of emissions from dirty fuels is dropping, but total emissions is rising much faster?
notfried10 个月前
Low price to pay for our AI-generated theme backgrounds in Chrome. &#x2F;s
jejeyyy7710 个月前
who cares lol
评论 #41106784 未加载