This has confirmed all my worries. Whenever the intelligence agencies and the politicians lobby for "cyber-bills" and such, and it's almost never about "protecting US against threats", but about "attacking others".<p>So on one hand they keep drumming up the fear mongering about other countries attacking us through "cyberspace" and that they <i>need</i> "these bills" to stop that, when in fact the bills, and the bigger budgets, are all about US attacking others, and basically committing acts of war against them (their words, not mine).<p>If the US is really afraid of "cyber-threats", then they really need to ramp up the <i>defense</i> at home, <i>not</i> offense, and keep as much of the critical infrastructure off the Internet as possible.<p>Oh, and these are a couple of funny posts about the politicians' abuse of the word "cyber":<p><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120614/01590919314/cyberpolitics-cyberbellicosity-cyberpushing-cybersecurity-to-cyberprevent-cyberwar.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120614/01590919314/cyberp...</a><p><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120615/03214619333/politicians-who-cried-cyber-pearl-harbor-wolf.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120615/03214619333/politi...</a>