TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

X (Twitter) Sues Former Advertisers

36 点作者 agiacalone9 个月前

6 条评论

JohnFen9 个月前
Wow, that&#x27;s crazy-town even for Musk. They keep using the term &quot;illegal&quot; to refer to everyone&#x27;s right to decide who they will or won&#x27;t do business with. I&#x27;m eagerly anticipating hearing what law(s) Musk thinks were broken.<p>This looks for all the world like a desperation move.
评论 #41174604 未加载
评论 #41175493 未加载
dimator9 个月前
Advertisers can choose where to spend the ad bucks, based on absolutely any criteria, how is this lawsuit even a thing?<p>I would bet that law firms love fragile rich people. &quot;Sure, we&#x27;ll write up that lawsuit for you, bill coming soon!&quot;
gamblor9569 个月前
Note that Musk deliberately filed this in a federal district court known for its extreme far-right rulings.<p>Expect the district court judge to play along. It&#x27;s possible the 5th Circuit may go along with this farce as well (several of the panels would gladly give Musk whatever he wants, but if it goes to an en banc review it&#x27;s unlikely the full bench would agree), but even the current SCOTUS wouldn&#x27;t rule in Musk&#x27;s favor.
评论 #41175514 未加载
tracerbulletx9 个月前
Refusal to Deal is generally something like trying to force a supplier to only work with you and not your competitor. This is nothing like that. Also good luck getting new companies to advertise with you now that they know you sue people who stop.
ChrisArchitect9 个月前
[dupe] Some more discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41173217">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41173217</a>
agiacalone9 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;8LB7U" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;8LB7U</a>