TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

China is stockpiling – we must do the same

43 点作者 jseliger9 个月前

9 条评论

Gathering66789 个月前
&quot;it is spending about $700 billion&quot;<p>Where is the number from? Stockholm International Peace Research Institute estimates China&#x27;s military expenditure in 2022 to be $292.0 billion, trailing $877.0 billion of US. (source: [Wikipedia](<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Military_budget_of_China" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Military_budget_of_China</a>))<p>There are not a lot more numbers (let alone numbers with sources) in the article. China has a lot of EV batteries because it is leading in promoting EV usage. It stockpiles a lot of agricultural products because, well, there are a lot of mouths to feed.
评论 #41182865 未加载
评论 #41179605 未加载
评论 #41179433 未加载
DrScientist9 个月前
Places like China and India etc have huge human resources and will inevitably [1] catch up the West in terms of economic power.<p>We have two broad choices<p>- brutally suppress development in these countries to remain &#x27;top dog&#x27; or<p>- continue to build those international structures that were founded after the second world war - like the UN, that were designed to stop a repeat of WWII.<p>I fear the current approach of unpicking international norms and constraints in order to be able to do more of option 1 is leading us to WWWIII, not protecting us from it.<p>[1] If we don&#x27;t take option 1 above.
评论 #41182235 未加载
评论 #41180377 未加载
评论 #41182285 未加载
评论 #41180618 未加载
yamrzou9 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;o4hME" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;o4hME</a>
maxglute9 个月前
US sanctions on PRC limit what PRC can buy now, may be confiscated pending US admin to prevent PRC spending later.<p>Meanwhile PRC trade surplus huge -&gt; PRC USD reserves huge -&gt; USD is strong and commodity prices not too whack due to global slow down.<p>Why not stock up now? Eventual global recovery could trigger expensive commodity super cycle. Would it be helpful in war, sure. But PRC needs to build up nukes first, going to take a few years for 50% parity.
kkfx9 个月前
When climate change people have to change, this means migrations, war for resources etc, ANYONE wise do it&#x27;s best to be as resilient and resourceful as possible. Accidentally this is the opposite of modern nazi-management paradigm.
评论 #41180627 未加载
snapplebobapple9 个月前
This guy misses the point (although he is right we should be stockpiling munitions and a bunch of other strategic things). China has to stockpile because they are net importers of almost all raw resources and a decently long list of countries can field a naval force strong enough to, for example, block the strait of malacca which would hobble them in months, not years. There&#x27;s no equivalent for America on everything (There are pain points like semiconductors but they are pain points for everyone, not just america. The big ticket items (food and energy) can be handled internally at this point).
OutOfHere9 个月前
China is accumulating commodities that will make its currency a dominating one in the global reserve currency space. It&#x27;s a long term play, and I don&#x27;t believe it has anything to do with Trump or Taiwan.
评论 #41184141 未加载
McDyver9 个月前
This opinion piece is so loaded with fear mongering, divisiveness and subtle suggestions of &quot;faits accomplis&quot;, that I can&#x27;t read it without propaganda alarms sounding everywhere
评论 #41184679 未加载
评论 #41180650 未加载
评论 #41180329 未加载
r0ckarong9 个月前
So engage in a resource war and anything else really than putting any effort in stopping Trump. Got it.