TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Oatmeal v. FunnyJunk, Part III

27 点作者 palebluedot将近 13 年前

2 条评论

droithomme将近 13 年前
"security attacks instigated by Matt Inman"<p>That sure as heck sounds defamatory, but I bet the words are carefully chosen.<p>&#62; instigated - 2. Incite someone to do something, esp. something bad.<p>Hm, now it seems nuanced word selection asking what the definition of "is" is.<p>What does incite mean then?<p>&#62; in·cite - To provoke and urge on: troublemakers who incite riots; inciting workers to strike.<p>Hm, although Inman's articles may have provoked others outraged by Mr. Carreon's absurd legal demand letter, I see no evidence Inman urged anyone on. Carreon's letter itself was sufficiently inciteful to inspire attacks from unknown parties of its own accord.<p>Mr. Carreon may be attempting to provoke Mr. Inman into an emotional state where he says something that is actionable, or for Mr. Inman to unnecessarily spend money on costly legal maneuvers that Mr. Carreon can then interact with at no personal financial cost, eventually wearing out Mr. Inman.<p>If it was me, at this point I would document everything and not respond at all beyond publicly posting all received correspondence letters without commentary so that the facts of the case may speak for themselves to the public.
评论 #4118781 未加载
hobin将近 13 年前
I admit it, I chuckled. Sometimes I think this kind of news is the soap opera for geeks.
评论 #4118747 未加载
评论 #4118709 未加载