TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Faulty instructions in Alibaba's T-Head C910 RISC-V CPUs blow away all security

10 点作者 thebeardisred9 个月前

2 条评论

snvzz9 个月前
To clear up some possible confusion, seen in discussions elsewhere.<p>This is a bug specific to a microarchitecture, not the RISC-V spec.<p>It affects a specific microarchitecture&#x27;s implementation of a custom Vector extension, not the RISC-V Vector spec.<p>This custom Vector extension is based in a draft of RISC-V Vector spec with a bunch of THead-specific modifications&#x2F;additions. It is not based on nor compatible with the ratified RISC-V Vector spec.<p>There&#x27;s nothing to suggest there&#x27;s anything inherently wrong with RISC-V spec, or even that any microarchitectures outside of THead&#x27;s could be affected.<p>Additionally, there are no known implementations of THead custom vector extension outside of THead&#x27;s own microarchitectures.
评论 #41188389 未加载
thebeardisred9 个月前
I&#x27;ll be in Vegas all weekend and would love to talk about this IRL.