TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google took three months to remove scam app that stole over $5M

360 点作者 svenfaw9 个月前

18 条评论

autoexec9 个月前
She&#x27;s suing Google for the 5M she lost because &quot;she believed Google was successfully preventing scam apps from becoming available on the Google Play store.&quot; and not because it took them so long to take the scammer&#x27;s app down. If they&#x27;d done it within 5 minutes it wouldn&#x27;t have stopped her from losing her money.<p>I think google should be held accountable for not removing a malicious app from their app store within a reasonable amount of time, but I&#x27;m less sure that Google should be on the hook for the money scammers take. Google can and should do a lot more to prevent malicious apps on their platform, and they should be required to respond quickly when the ones they failed to detect are reported to them, but a play store that only allowed&#x2F;contained apps that Google was 100% confident could never be used to scam another person wouldn&#x27;t be very useful.
评论 #41286860 未加载
评论 #41286493 未加载
评论 #41286425 未加载
评论 #41286495 未加载
评论 #41286935 未加载
评论 #41286284 未加载
Aeolun9 个月前
It still boggles my mind that you can build a fortune of several million, but then be naive enough to download a random <i>crypto</i> app off the app store, and expect it to be all sunshine and rainbows. Even several massive legalish crypto empires fell over due to fraud. Using a random one off the app store is a recipe for disaster.
评论 #41286849 未加载
评论 #41286777 未加载
评论 #41286924 未加载
评论 #41287248 未加载
评论 #41286623 未加载
评论 #41287464 未加载
评论 #41286649 未加载
评论 #41289468 未加载
评论 #41286728 未加载
hansvm9 个月前
This is the company profiting from the obvious fraud, de-funding departments designed to block such frauds, and with a history of using their size to blunder past any legislative sanctions. I&#x27;m shocked, _shocked_ I tell you that the fraud benefiting them personally was allowed to go on for so long.<p>In less sarcastic news, I&#x27;m legitimately surprised it was dropped in only 3 months. That&#x27;s a better than average outcome.
评论 #41288447 未加载
ggm9 个月前
Possibly an unpopular view but I can&#x27;t but think the FTC should be able to issue directions to Google and others which have almost instant effect. &quot;this is a scam, shut it down&quot; should not require them to &quot;get back to you about that&quot; if it comes from the Trade Commission.<p>I am pretty much all-in on more government regulation of Google. Not less. There should be a non-negotiable access path to ask why things happen and an appeals process to their lockouts for end users too. Mandatory human-in-the-loop review.
评论 #41287507 未加载
19f191ty9 个月前
I&#x27;ve reported am explicitly Temu ad a million times and it still keeps appearing. I don&#x27;t understand why they even have the report feature if they&#x27;re not going to do anything about it. Feel so helpless.
评论 #41288481 未加载
评论 #41287449 未加载
tomschwiha9 个月前
This seems to be a screenshot of the app, the app offered no transaction fee buying of crypto:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;play-lh.googleusercontent.com&#x2F;0kI_n_a9ntn9iiispSqN-YaCjwR9j7BExFWiLYjrii4TXl7VcYnzoUo-0KVx66Fk1B38=h1024-rw" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;play-lh.googleusercontent.com&#x2F;0kI_n_a9ntn9iiispSqN-Y...</a>
评论 #41287382 未加载
nojvek9 个月前
I lost 1 ETH worth of crypto in scam. It was something on the lines of you invest your crypto, and they&#x27;d put it up on art assets that would increase in value and you&#x27;d get your returns back.<p>I got no returns when I wanted to take it out. Just fake UI showing it was going up when it wasn&#x27;t.<p>It was a great reminder, that crypto is full of scam. It&#x27;s not even a great asset to hedge against inflation as it&#x27;s heavily speculated on. I took all my crypto out and went back to good ol stocks, bonds and gold.<p>Soooooooooooooo much crypto scam.
nblgbg9 个月前
I don&#x27;t know anything about this app, and this is the first time I&#x27;m hearing about it. Does this app somehow generate revenue? Is that the reason it took them so long to act? Or is it that so few people downloaded it, resulting in fewer complaints compared to the number of downloads? I know Google has been getting worse over time. I&#x27;m just trying to understand why it took them so long to act when they actively penalize smaller developers!
评论 #41289081 未加载
评论 #41288103 未加载
AtlasBarfed9 个月前
Google really doesn&#x27;t want people to know what goes on in pay to win games.<p>While they aren&#x27;t outright fraud, they are right there. And those apps probably make billions a year.
评论 #41286423 未加载
评论 #41286487 未加载
评论 #41286605 未加载
joseppudev9 个月前
for the interested, there is also the case of scorp detailed in forbes article below <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;johnkoetsier&#x2F;2021&#x2F;02&#x2F;02&#x2F;porn-app-network-scamming-iphone-users-for-26m-per-month-says-apps-exposed&#x2F;?sh=305313a07129" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;johnkoetsier&#x2F;2021&#x2F;02&#x2F;02&#x2F;porn-ap...</a>
izacus9 个月前
Can someone from US answer why did US legal system fail to punish the people who created a scam app in three months?
评论 #41289099 未加载
评论 #41288832 未加载
xyst9 个月前
Poor woman succumbed to pig butchering scam. Not sure if this is the same woman or not, but I recall another pig butchering scam where the victim also sent family funds to scammer.<p>Honestly, this person must really be well off to be able to send $5M at any time and then be able to keep a lawyer on retainer to litigate against big G
perryizgr89 个月前
This is an example of blatant, obvious scam, but there are also many many others that are technically fine, but effectively end up with the &quot;customer&quot; feeling scammed anyway.<p>Example: There are many apps that will only let you use the functionality if you agree to a 7 day free trial, which automatically starts billing you some exorbitant <i>weekly</i> fee as soon as that trial ends. Google will typically not refund this when a scammed user complains, since they technically agreed to the terms.<p>But IMO this is absolute bullshit. $50&#x2F;week for a stupid flashlight app is not reasonable anywhere. It shows that the only intent of the app is to trick people. No real user would consider paying that much for what the app offers.<p>But Google benefits from this, so they do absolutely nothing about it, and the play store is full of such crap. The Google&#x2F;Apple tax on every purchase you make on their platforms is pure profit, none of it is used to make the store better for the customers or genuine sellers.<p>I will avoid spending a single ₹ on these platforms as a result, and will try to avoid ever writing code for their platforms. Either my app succeeds on the open web, or it doesn&#x27;t succeed at all. I&#x27;m willing to give up on the entire mobile market due to this, I&#x27;ll not be part of a system that exists majorly to trick people into parting with their money and data.
system29 个月前
Not victim blaming but wow. Some people are really naive yet they can still have so much money while very high IQ people struggle to make money due to their lack of social skills.
评论 #41289705 未加载
评论 #41287360 未加载
评论 #41287896 未加载
评论 #41288694 未加载
评论 #41287953 未加载
rvba9 个月前
Google outsources everything to the lowest bidder, so quality is as it is.
Uptrenda9 个月前
I don&#x27;t think we should blame the victim. Tech is insanely complex and some scams are so sophisticated now that if you&#x27;re not switched on all the time you might get caught. The vector here seems to be an app posing as something trustworthy. Or what she claims as an app riding the reputation of Google. But to me its the same issue underlying phishing: impersonation.<p>Is impersonation fundamentally unpatchable? How does one ever really &#x27;know for certain&#x27; that an app, website, etc, is legit? Could this be fixed, once-and-for-all, with something like a hardware device issued to all citizens with early education around scams? Or would scammers still find ways around it with things like misspellings, subtle details in presentation, or what-ever have you.
评论 #41287946 未加载
burnte9 个月前
That&#x27;s amazing, it took them 3 months to kill a scam app, but they proactively shutdown smaller apps that break no rules constantly. I swear someone in Google&#x27;s exec team is going out of their way to make Google products suck. They&#x27;ve all been getting worse for the past several years. Search gives bad results, search qualifiers only work in &quot;verbatim&quot; mode, GMail sucks at spam filtering now, Android is becoming a PITA, Chrome is shoving in new bad features while killing old good features, etc. There was even a big thing about Google Voice having some massive change where lots of features were going away, so I pulled GV out of my life expecting it to go away, and literally nothing changed.<p>It&#x27;s almost like Google is suicidal and these are calls for help.
评论 #41287931 未加载
评论 #41287046 未加载
评论 #41286890 未加载
评论 #41286839 未加载
评论 #41288073 未加载
评论 #41289418 未加载
评论 #41287666 未加载
评论 #41288343 未加载
评论 #41288152 未加载
评论 #41288603 未加载
评论 #41287850 未加载
评论 #41288743 未加载
评论 #41286982 未加载
评论 #41286702 未加载
评论 #41288048 未加载
评论 #41287992 未加载
评论 #41289208 未加载
stevebmark9 个月前
No settlement should be granted here, on principle. The law should not protect those that use an asset designed to subvert the government.
评论 #41287139 未加载
评论 #41307962 未加载