TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

What comes after the AI crash?

16 点作者 BerislavLopac10 个月前

3 条评论

DoctorOetker10 个月前
I presume the down-to-earth &quot;Deep Mathematics&quot; and &quot;Deep Differential Algorithms and Differential Datastructures&quot; and &quot;Deep Physics&quot; sobering up.<p>There is gradual historical transfer of problems first residing in a vague &quot;aristotelian logic&quot; phase, then gradually ever more formal phase, first quantitative descriptive and eventually and only then the normative formalization (i.e. figures of merit etc..).<p>When physicists and engineers apply RMAD to known and understood (but computationally intensive) total potential&#x2F;lagrangian&#x2F;total-figure-of-merit... functions, people don&#x27;t call it AI, not even necessarily machine learning.<p>When RMAD is used to optimize vague intuitionistic reasoning like LLMs we do call it AI.<p>Given the gradual transfer of problems from the vague domain to the explicit domain (formalize or fossilize), &quot;after AI&quot; comes the very same RMAD, but applied to find optima for formally specified and understood-in-the-sense-of-reductionism-but-not-in-emergent-sense systems. (i.e. a computer does not behave like a giant transistor).
christkv10 个月前
Spending for training might be getting closer but I can&#x27;t imagine that spending for inference will slack off. However for inference it will be all about power efficiency I imagine to bring the cost down over time for the end users and businesses.
wegfawefgawefg10 个月前
This is a worthless article completely devoid of substance. The author just wants to see it fail and is virtue signaling about potential harms or something.<p>The truth is we do not know if AI will keep growing, or stagnate, in the same way we dont know if moores law will keep going or die each year.<p>The only way AI stops getting better is if computers stop getting higher compute per kwh.
评论 #41290247 未加载
评论 #41291568 未加载