TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Millennials Are Becoming Boomers

29 点作者 johntfella9 个月前

14 条评论

karaterobot9 个月前
The takeaway from this is that if generational cohorts come to resemble each other over time, then gosh, maybe they were always terrible, arbitrary, misleading distinctions in the first place.
评论 #41296100 未加载
评论 #41294892 未加载
eternal_braid9 个月前
If a resource is practically unlimited (say air), then money doesn&#x27;t play a role.<p>Money is a way to assign priority to the acquisition of a resource, similarly to the role of a queue. If a generation is wealthier or not compared to others, it only speaks about how we share resources in society, assuming the wealth is being consumed.<p>For a society to be richer overall, it doesn&#x27;t need more money. It needs more resources.
评论 #41300874 未加载
UniverseHacker9 个月前
Hmmm… this does not jive with personal experience. Almost everyone I know in my boomer parents generation bought large homes with land on a single income and no college degree, and still have them… which they sit in alone, with entire floors of empty bedrooms they never enter. Most of my millennial friends have dual graduate degree dual six figure incomes but pretty much have to rent because a mortgage on a small single family home would not leave enough money for childcare so they could keep working. They technically could buy but they’d be stretched so thin it would be really hard, so they don’t.<p>For example, take home pay from two 100k salaries is about $11,850&#x2F;mo total. A mortgage, taxes, and insurance on a 1.1 M home (a small 2 bedroom that needs work here in the Bay Area) could be $8k&#x2F;mo, not considering upkeep costs. Childcare for two children would be ~3k&#x2F;mo, already bringing it even, without food, cars, etc.
评论 #41295382 未加载
underwater9 个月前
This data is sketchy to say the least.<p>The chart showing home ownership rate is broken down by &quot;generation&quot; but each cohort becomes skewed towards older members of that group as we move towards the present. If you look at boomers and millennials at age 25 that&#x27;s a fair comparison. But if you compare boomers and millennials at age 40, you&#x27;re now comparing all people born 1946 to 1964 (18 year range) against just the millennials born 1981 to 1984 (3 year range). This group of older millennials were in their late 20s when house prices tanked after the financial crisis and in their mid 30s by the time home prices started rising dramatically in 2020. This selection bias means if there is an overall downward trend in home ownership, the boomer line will stay fixed but the millennial line for ages 28 to 43 will move down next time the data is analyzed. This is almost certain to happen.<p>The second bit of fudging that&#x27;s going on is that this chart is looking at <i>home</i> ownership. But a home is not a house. Millennials and Gen Z are more likely to buy an apartment than previous generations. It&#x27;s not fair to say that a boomer buying a free standing house is equivalent to a millennial buying a two-bedroom apartment. The quality of life and the opportunity for capital gains are much lower.
johnea9 个月前
This copmment is NOT about the &quot;free market&quot; mythology 8-)<p>The big takeaway: the kidult generation is finally understanding that they too will continue to age. Not as an insight, just admitting to what&#x27;s already happened.<p>This is also not a new phenomenon. The &quot;boomers&quot; were of course the &quot;don&#x27;t trust anyone over 30&quot; generation. (Talkin&#x27; &#x27;bout my gen.. gen.. generation)<p>Children always perceive themselves as somehow a separate species from the previous generation. Then they grow into it.<p>Another glaring example is the Sunrise Movement (which I wholeheartedly support!). Greta and crew where touting the &quot;grownups ruined everything&quot; mantra. Now they&#x27;re all adults (at least legally).<p>Most everyone gets there, and the alternative is grim.
lWaterboardCats9 个月前
Hold your horses there, these are sweeping claims that seems like the author boiled it down to “Well millennials bought cheap houses before 2020, so they got cheap houses too, like their parents”<p>Just because folks got a cheap rate on houses doesn’t mean they can afford the risk over a lifetime.<p>Boomers could work relatively simple jobs and pay off a house. Right now a house is a much much much larger liability than it has ever been
评论 #41295223 未加载
评论 #41294880 未加载
JohnMakin9 个月前
Yet another attempt at the multi-decade long gaslighting campaign targeting millennials with skewed, cherrypicked data with dubious, sweeping conclusions - just as it always has been, just as it always will be.<p>First off, this data uses a generational start date of 1979. I&#x27;ve never, ever seen a millennial range defined here, but sure, let&#x27;s go with that. Half or more millennials are home owners? Bullshit. Show me where that data is coming from. Let&#x27;s assume it&#x27;s true though, I&#x27;d surmise most of these numbers are from boomer generations dying off and leaving property&#x2F;inheritance to their children. Does that really say all that much?<p>As far as &quot;biggest wealth generation jump since 2016&quot; like yea no shit, I&#x27;d guess you could take a slice of years from any generation that&#x27;s exiting young adulthood into their careers and see a similar relative jump. This is a red flag example because it doesn&#x27;t measure against similar ranges in other generations early career years. Your wealth doesn&#x27;t change much as a percentage of your total wealth as you get older and richer - for reasons that shouldn&#x27;t need a lot of explaining.<p>In other words, I have $1 to my name and it goes to $3 within 8 years. a boomer has $100 and it goes to $110 in 8 years. Wow, these millennials are complaining about a THREE HUNDRED PERCENT increase to their wealth compared to us?
ivanech9 个月前
“Redfin data shows millennials are more or less on track with previous generations”<p>“more or less” is doing some heavy lifting. The chart referenced shows a pretty dramatic discontinuity between Millennials and Gen X &#x2F; Boomers from age 25 to 35 w.r.t homeownership rate.
评论 #41303800 未加载
d-m-m9 个月前
The chart in the article shows 25% homeownership rate for Gen Z 19 year olds. So if you meet a current 19 year old there is a 1&#x2F;4 chance they own a house? It’s total nonsense, Redfin has fabricated this data. The median age for first time mortgages is 35.
评论 #41295011 未加载
simonblack9 个月前
I suppose the &quot;OK, Boomer&quot; will now become &quot;OK, Millennial&quot;.<p>Of course this was going to happen, it&#x27;s what always happens, generation after generation. It&#x27;s called &#x27;The Cycle of Life&#x27;. We&#x27;ve been doing it for several million years.
djaouen9 个月前
Wait, hold up, lemme check... Nope, still poor! Lol
swagmoose9 个月前
I gotta wonder how much of this wealth change is self-earned vs. inheritance (or benevolence) of our boomer parents.
评论 #41294911 未加载
klipklop9 个月前
I dunno, my lack of home ownership does not have me feeling like a Boomer.
lispisok9 个月前
Cool more data showing if you didnt get on the housing ladder before 2021 you are screwed.
评论 #41294887 未加载
评论 #41294900 未加载