TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Extreme Renters Who Own Nothing

6 点作者 lxm9 个月前

5 条评论

quantified9 个月前
From a resource point of view, renting can be more efficient for things that are used infrequently. Fewer objects need to be created, the costs are in the transport to renters (cars, cameras, etc.) For things used all the time, renting fits certain usage patterns. You can't update a rental dwelling to your tastes, for example. And of course, if you return something in not-so-good shape, you will lose security deposits and possibly have other financial damage. It's always other people's stuff, often a corporation with corporate lawyers.
theandrewbailey9 个月前
&gt; For her phone, Brooks is on a plan under which she pays $28 a month. Buying it outright would easily cost $900 or more up front, plus she likes the excitement of being able to upgrade to a new model every few years.<p>&gt; “Maybe one day that will change, but I think it’s more realistic for me,” said Brooks, 23. “Life is just unpredictable.”<p>Is her life so unpredictable that she don&#x27;t know if she&#x27;ll need a phone next month?
评论 #41303110 未加载
评论 #41303829 未加载
评论 #41303819 未加载
评论 #41302839 未加载
jerlam9 个月前
Other than the 20-something couple mentioned in the first paragraph, none of the people mentioned I would categorize as remotely extreme. Leasing a car or renting home repair tools is not out of the ordinary. It is not surprising that someone who expects to move often, or has a small home, would strive to avoid permanently owning a lot of physical objects.<p>Maybe this is just the audience that WSJ writes for.
theandrewbailey9 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;wPtYG" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;wPtYG</a>
hindsightbias9 个月前
What you own owns you.