TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Making an atomic trampoline [video]

149 点作者 matricaria9 个月前

10 条评论

femto9 个月前
Below is a table of elements used, ordered by boiling point. Beryllium has the lowest boiling point at 2742K. Zirconium has the highest melting point at 2125K. This means the furnace temperature was greater than 2125K.<p>TIG temperature can easily reach 3000C (close enough to 3000K) [1], more than the boiling point of beryllium. The temperature of the metal slug would rise until it reaches thermal equilibrium through heat loss, the energy loss likely being due to the vapourisation of the element with the lowest boiling point: beryllium.<p>That smoke was probably beryllium vapour.<p>I&#x27;m no expert, but I would assume the beryllium vapour would not have made it out of the apparatus. By luck, it would have condensed either before reaching the HEPA filter or on its way through the HEPA filter, even though the HEPA filter was not designed to stop a vapour. Nile Red also had the sense to use a fume cupboard. Despite this, the inside of the apparatus could well have been coated with friable condensed beryllium, which would probably not have been flushed by the argon. If doing this, I&#x27;d take additional precautions against condensing beryllium vapour containing the equipment (I don&#x27;t know what they might be).<p>Maybe it&#x27;s a case of controlling arc temperature to keep it below the boiling point of beryllium? Maybe a small amount of impurity with a lower boiling point can be added to the mix, so it boils off first and avoids the beryllium boiling? This might also prevent loss of beryllium from altering the composition of the glass?<p>How would the pros handle this risk?<p>I gather there are similar issues with the refining of silicon, in which silicon vapour can cause silicosis.<p><pre><code> Element Melt Boil Beryllium 1560K 2742K Copper 1357K 2835K Nickel 1728K 3003K Titanium 1491K 3560K Zirconium 2125K 4650K </code></pre> [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hypertextbook.com&#x2F;facts&#x2F;2007&#x2F;AnthonyHo.shtml" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hypertextbook.com&#x2F;facts&#x2F;2007&#x2F;AnthonyHo.shtml</a>
评论 #41416108 未加载
评论 #41417912 未加载
评论 #41416339 未加载
JKCalhoun9 个月前
I recall a display at the Museum of Science and Industry back in the early 1970&#x27;s that featured steel balls bouncing on steel plinths not unlike the video.<p>I recall too a pair of angled plinths and the steel balls would appear from an opening in the display, drop and bounce from one plinth to the other before exiting (repeat).<p>No amount of googling has helped shed any light as to &quot;What that was&quot;. Perhaps this metallic glass.<p>(Also recall a computer that you could play Tic-Tac-Toe against. The input was a more or less a telephone keypad, the display large neon X&#x27;s and O&#x27;s. Seven year old me, or thereabouts, was fascinated to read that the computer had never yet lost.)
评论 #41415265 未加载
评论 #41416511 未加载
gcanyon9 个月前
Nile Red never ceases to amaze with his technical competence. If I tried to do something with beryllium I&#x27;d be dead. And the trampoline would fail.
评论 #41415493 未加载
评论 #41413818 未加载
rowanG0779 个月前
He really is delving into metallurgy with his more recent videos. Purple gold and now this. What&#x27;s next? Intermetallic titanium gold alloy?
评论 #41414554 未加载
评论 #41416102 未加载
chii9 个月前
At $14k a piece, buying a vacuum forge just to make one video is an eye popping price to pay!<p>I wonder what else could the forge be used for in future videos?
评论 #41415124 未加载
评论 #41414997 未加载
评论 #41414940 未加载
评论 #41415053 未加载
somat9 个月前
A thought I had when I saw the original Steve Mould video, and this video made me remember it.<p>What happens if you just use glass for the bouncing surface? I was reading about the materials and I am not sure what property contributes to it&#x27;s bounciness, but I think it is tensile strength(but it may be surface hardness). and regular glass has a slightly lower tensile strength than these amorphous metallic structures, fused quartz has a higher tensile strength, and I was unable to find out what tempered glass is, but I suspect tempered glass would tend to shatter if a small hard ball was bounced off it. Anyway, I was unable to form a good hypothesis as to what would happen, but I did find that mcmaster-carr sells fused quartz disks if anyone wants to try.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mcmaster.com&#x2F;products&#x2F;glass-discs&#x2F;ultra-high-temperature-quartz-glass-rods-and-discs&#x2F;?s=glass-discs" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mcmaster.com&#x2F;products&#x2F;glass-discs&#x2F;ultra-high-tem...</a>
评论 #41413809 未加载
评论 #41413231 未加载
评论 #41415060 未加载
mikewarot9 个月前
I think electrochemical polishing[1] of the discs on both faces could be done without killing anyone. Since everything happens in a liquid, no vapors should evolve.<p>A VERY flat surface might greatly increase the bounce.<p>A surface coating of BAM[2] might also help, by increasing the hardness, and lubricity.<p>I think there&#x27;s a lot of room to go in increasing the hang time of the bouncing bearing.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Electrochemical_grinding" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Electrochemical_grinding</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Aluminium_magnesium_boride" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Aluminium_magnesium_boride</a>
评论 #41417710 未加载
perdomon9 个月前
I wish he&#x27;d just talk normal instead of inflecting his voice in that robotic way.
评论 #41414959 未加载
评论 #41413854 未加载
评论 #41416237 未加载
评论 #41426802 未加载
评论 #41417180 未加载
评论 #41415864 未加载
评论 #41418199 未加载
arendtio9 个月前
Does anyone know why he did not try to increase the argon pressure? Wouldn&#x27;t it help to completely fill the mold with metal?
评论 #41416220 未加载
评论 #41416093 未加载
评论 #41417157 未加载
emilfihlman9 个月前
I was disappointed it wasn&#x27;t related to low level systems programming haha!