By his last sentence this writer endorsed the criminal behavior the article spoke about. Simply appalling. By endorsing it he signals his lack of concern for those lowest on the socioeconomic rung who have struggled their whole lives merely to feed themselves and ATTEMPT to keep up with a greed driven world. Such a "windfall" as an extra 10k, 20k, or 30k would for MANY effectively free them from the struggle they have been unable to escape for the duration of their time on this planet, provided the money isn't frivolously wasted of course. In the face of such a release from financial freedom it,s no wonder so many choose to risk the possible legal consequences. And why write as though its an issue if clearly you dgaf but cheer them on as though its two rival teams in competition with each other and you're rooting for the underdog? Well congratulations, you side with anarchy, theft, immorality, and no clear path towards making this situation better for the more ill equipped team. The article said nothing more than, "Gotta get it together better banks!" Bravo.