TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Social Web Did Not Begin in 2008

54 点作者 erlend_sh8 个月前

16 条评论

jillesvangurp8 个月前
The social web was blogs. That kind of peaked around 2008 and fizzled out after Google Reader was shut down a few years later. Which would be around the time Twitter and Facebook emerged. Before that you had things like various messengers ICQ, MSN, AOL, etc. that are long forgotten. And before that you had NNTP, which some people might still remember is where all the action used to be in the nineties. Before the web took off, you had things like gopher. But that never really took off and kind of was squeezed in between the early web and the BBSes of the nineteen eighties. Several of those things were popularized in popular culture (movies, etc.). You had War Games in the eighties. You&#x27;ve got Mail in the nineties. The social network. Etc.<p>In short, the social web has been around for decades in various forms. Mastodon has yet to make any impact in popular culture. I wouldn&#x27;t necessarily call Mastodon very modern. It lacks basic security features (like content signatures or end to end encryption) and it&#x27;s based on a random thing that W3C standardized some decades ago that never really took off otherwise. It wouldn&#x27;t be too hard make it a bit more modern. But there&#x27;s an odd resistance against doing sane things like that in the mastodon community. It&#x27;s a very conservative community looking backwards at the past and not the future.
评论 #41645333 未加载
评论 #41645954 未加载
评论 #41645069 未加载
评论 #41646783 未加载
fxtentacle8 个月前
In my opinion, the most interesting part of that website is the author&#x27;s self-presentation: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;slow.dog&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;slow.dog&#x2F;</a>
评论 #41645419 未加载
mkarliner8 个月前
I don&#x27;t really care if you think that someone has appropriated a term you think they don&#x27;t deserve. I do care and support any movement that has the goal of detoxifying the social media scene.
评论 #41645337 未加载
评论 #41651381 未加载
评论 #41645050 未加载
评论 #41645002 未加载
a_e_k8 个月前
If we&#x27;re just talking <i>web</i>, I&#x27;m old enough to remember web rings [0].<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Webring" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Webring</a>
评论 #41645925 未加载
评论 #41645294 未加载
Ekaros8 个月前
Usenet was federated. And it is old...<p>Then there is <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;irc-galleria.net" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;irc-galleria.net</a> which to me is clearly social media started in 2000... And I think there might be some older sites.
评论 #41644971 未加载
评论 #41646188 未加载
mikewarot8 个月前
I have memories of computer mediated social networks that extend back to about 1982 or so. For a long time, I got messages from friends I met there at this email address<p><pre><code> inhp4!chinet!ka9dgx </code></pre> I belonged to APCU, a user group even longer than that. This web of social computer users extends back into the 1950s before me with organizations like SHARE[1]. Founded in 1955.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.share.org&#x2F;About&#x2F;About-Us" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.share.org&#x2F;About&#x2F;About-Us</a>
mrkramer8 个月前
&gt;It’s one thing to argue that ActivityPub is “the future of the social web” (as Ben does, and as I hope it isn’t)<p>Then what it is? I think ActivityPub is the good start. Imo Fediverse is the most exciting thing on the Internet since Bitcoin.<p>&gt;Blogs were the social web. Friendster was the social web. MySpace was the social web. Twitter was the social web. With the exception of blogs, this wasn’t cross-platform sociality, but it nonetheless was the social web.<p>Blogs were and are the only true decentralized and distributed social platform; in the early days of the commercial internet, people thought that the prevalent social platform would be something like Atom&#x2F;RSS where you would be distributing content in a decentralized fashion e.g. Blogosphere and not concentrate everything in a centralized fashion ala Medium or other similar platforms. Even Blogger and Substack were and are steps in a good direction since they are not per se centralized.<p>Friendster, MySpace, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram were the opportunistic social networking projects because it was easier to centralize everything under one host and under one management because it&#x27;s easier to control the platform that way. Powerful distributed social networking protocols didn&#x27;t exist and it wasn&#x27;t clear how they would work but now picture is getting clearer. Project like aforementioned ActivityPub and Web Monetization[0] are decent attempts at trying to reclaim back the control of your digital social interactions because everything is getting easier now: cross-platform interaction, migrating your data(content and contacts) from one platform to another etc. etc.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;foundation.mozilla.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;campaigns&#x2F;web-monetization&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;foundation.mozilla.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;campaigns&#x2F;web-monetization...</a>
评论 #41645938 未加载
tpoacher8 个月前
It&#x27;s a shame that it&#x27;s such a taboo analogy to use in professional situations, because I&#x27;ve found explaining things to friends via &quot;the Pornhub analogy&quot; to be the final thing that makes them &#x27;click&#x27; when explaining similar things relating to the web.<p>E.g. &quot;I don&#x27;t get it, what&#x27;s the difference between git and github? Well, it&#x27;s the same as the difference between porn and pornhub. Oooooh I get it now.&quot;<p>Same here. What&#x27;s the difference between the &#x27;Social Web(™)&#x27; and the internet as a place full of social &quot;web&quot; spaces? Well, it&#x27;s the same as the difference between the &#x27;PornHub(™)&#x27; and the internet as a place full of porn &quot;hubs&quot;.<p>Sorry, I&#x27;ll let myself out.
dayjah8 个月前
I really wish .plan files and the finger protocol had won this battle
评论 #41645461 未加载
cykros8 个月前
Who cares what they call it? Anyone that cares about decentralized social networking and is serious about it is on Nostr by now anyway. Let them say whatever they want in their cold, lonely, dark corners, which they&#x27;ve all secluded themselves in lording over their instance fiefdoms as they break the very federation they claim to be building.
IntelMiner8 个月前
I&#x27;d go back even further and say <i>Napster</i> was the original social net. You had to kill time somehow while downloading MP3&#x27;s slowly. Might as well chat with folks who like the same music you did!
评论 #41644703 未加载
评论 #41644721 未加载
评论 #41644820 未加载
评论 #41644836 未加载
Ukv8 个月前
I don&#x27;t see much issue with using the term in the sense defined by the W3C[0], particuarly for a group developing technology around that definition. It doesn&#x27;t mean the term can&#x27;t also have a broader&#x2F;colloquial meaning (web that is social). Same with the semantic web.<p>&gt; shit on everything else that’s been the social web<p>&gt; fuck this noise<p>&gt; it’s astonishingly brazen for ActivityWeb partisans to move to claim the banner for themselves<p>Maybe this hostility towards their use of the term stems largely from already being in a position of resentment towards them? It seems disproportionate to me when as far as I can tell it&#x27;s a non-profit group with positive goals, and I&#x27;ve heard positive things of those involved, but maybe I&#x27;m missing some reason to hate them?<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.w3.org&#x2F;TR&#x2F;social-web-protocols&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.w3.org&#x2F;TR&#x2F;social-web-protocols&#x2F;</a>
tazjin8 个月前
ActivityPub, the Fediverse and all of that are great places to go and discuss ActivityPub, the Fediverse and all of that. That&#x27;s pretty much it.
skrebbel8 个月前
EDIT: this was a snarky comment that didn&#x27;t add anything, can&#x27;t delete anymore but can still edit, so here goes.
评论 #41645957 未加载
评论 #41645029 未加载
nineteen9998 个月前
Too busy too read, we&#x27;re developing Web 9.0 over here.
cubefox8 个月前
It seems blogs weren&#x27;t social networks in the way Friendster was. Average people didn&#x27;t have a blog. Creating a Friendster account was much easier.
评论 #41652271 未加载