TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Show HN: Docs by Hashnode, we built another docs product in 2024, here's why

3 点作者 fazlerocks8 个月前
Hey HN,<p>I’m not sure if this post will stick (we’re competing with some YC-backed startups in this space), but I’ll give it a try!<p>We built Docs by Hashnode because we saw a gap in current documentation tools. Many platforms are either too rigid, lack customization (Like ReadMe), or require too much dev time to manage (Like Docusaurus). With our docs product, we wanted to create something that’s both flexible and scalable, allowing teams to focus on creating docs without the complexity.<p>Here’s what we’re solving:<p>1. Most doc platforms don’t scale well or offer customization.<p>2. Teams often struggle with rigid templates and version control.<p>3. Companies need API references and product guides that grow with their product, not against it.<p>Our solution:<p>1. Offer both Hosted and Headless mode with GraphQL support for those who need more control.<p>2.Real-time collaboration with inline commenting, perfect for technical and non-technical teams to work together.<p>3. AI-powered search for faster, smarter discovery of docs content.<p>4. Unlimited API references and guides to help you scale your docs as your product evolves.<p>5. Create API references easily using OpenAPI specs.<p>6. Blazing-fast performance optimized for SEO and Lighthouse scores.<p>Our goal is to build documentation that evolves with your product, not something that slows you down. Some early users, including YC startups, are already using it and love the flexibility.<p>Would love to get your feedback or answer any questions!<p>Thanks for reading! Excited to hear what the community here thinks.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hashnode.com&#x2F;products&#x2F;docs" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hashnode.com&#x2F;products&#x2F;docs</a>

1 comment

fazlerocks8 个月前
Well, I was right, I guess.