TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Chocolat 1.0 Released

90 点作者 dcope将近 13 年前

20 条评论

michaelmartin将近 13 年前
I've swapped to Chocolat as my full time text editor. I find it to be a really good cross between a plain+powerful text editor like Vim, but still with some of the pleasant UI touches of Espresso and such.<p>Its speed of development is great as well. It seems to get updates every week or two in the past few months. Compared to Textmate/Espresso/Coda etc, that's a real breath of fresh air.<p>That said, I haven't used Sublime 2 yet, and it seems to aim for similar goals, so no calls on which is best.<p>PS - You have to like the release notes:<p>"Feature – Major improvements to the version number. "
评论 #4173324 未加载
calinet6将近 13 年前
Unfortunately, the new standard in text editors has been set...<p>Chocolat, put up a direct comparison with Sublime Text 2, and tell me what you do better, and what you do worse. Be honest.<p>Then and only then might I consider even trying your software.<p>Just the harsh reality of the current market.
评论 #4173285 未加载
kylec将近 13 年前
I've been using the Chocolat betas for a while and it really is a nice editor. Worth $50, I don't know - for around that price you can get Sublime Text 2, BBEdit, or TextMate, all of which are more mature products.<p>I think Chocolat could be wildly successful as the "Pixelmator" to these other editors "Photoshop" if they dropped the price and sold it through the Mac App Store. But as it stands now, there's nothing that compells me to purchase it.
评论 #4173604 未加载
pdeuchler将近 13 年前
XKCD is always relevant: <a href="http://xkcd.com/927/" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/927/</a><p>I am, actually, a Chocolat user. I'm essentially using it as a TextMate2 replacement... comes with all the niceties of TM truffles and it's easy on the eyes. Does what I need it to do well, nothing more, nothing less.
mariusandra将近 13 年前
There are 14 competing text editors. I know, I'll make the best one and end this dispute once and for all! There are 15 competing text editors.
评论 #4174361 未加载
koenigdavidmj将近 13 年前
Yet another editor with a half-baked Vim mode!
评论 #4174634 未加载
comex将近 13 年前
I'm very reluctant to consider any editor that's not scriptable. Or if it is, it doesn't seem to be mentioned on the website...
评论 #4174048 未加载
ajacksified将近 13 年前
Neat, but, why not vim, which does all of these things? What differentiates it and justifies $50?
评论 #4173618 未加载
评论 #4172987 未加载
Karunamon将近 13 年前
Still doesn't handle YAML completely right. Try nesting quotes and using newlines within a single key- the highlighting gets completely confused.<p>Then try the same thing in BBEdit/Textwrangler to see the difference:<p>Chocolat: <a href="http://c.tkwa.re/2G1O2x3T2f1F1Y0I2G1t" rel="nofollow">http://c.tkwa.re/2G1O2x3T2f1F1Y0I2G1t</a><p>TextWrangler: <a href="http://c.tkwa.re/3w1V1V2g0I0H0C2t422t" rel="nofollow">http://c.tkwa.re/3w1V1V2g0I0H0C2t422t</a>
评论 #4173202 未加载
billpixby将近 13 年前
$10 more bucks gets you Sublime Text 2 :)
评论 #4172991 未加载
评论 #4172941 未加载
raimondious将近 13 年前
The app crashed the first time I opened it. The second time, I opened a file and the Python syntax mode marked lines in my file as invalid, even though they aren't and no other text editor marks them as such. It seems premature for a 1.0 release.
cybersunil将近 13 年前
Congrats on the 1.0 release. I have been following Chocolat's progress since a few months now and am impressed with how well it has improved.
techx2501将近 13 年前
I don't understand. But then again, I've havent used a Mac recently. Does this do something that Eclipse can't?
评论 #4172997 未加载
评论 #4172912 未加载
评论 #4172929 未加载
评论 #4173185 未加载
Derbasti将近 13 年前
Two questions:<p>1. Is it scriptable? 2. Does it have macros?<p>These are honest questions. The website did not mention anything at first glance. But without those, I would not consider it a serious text editor.<p>On the other hand, it not being cross platform makes it pretty much unusable for me.
bigdubs将近 13 年前
sublime text 2 was not the intended comp; textmate was (hence the compatibility with tmbundles etc.)<p>i use chocolat and enjoy it (have been using it since it's early open beta). the intellisense (or whatever you want to call it) feature is nicely implemented. the vim mode, though shallow, works if you're used to those key bindings for basic movement and editing etc.<p>i like it, overall. do i like it enough to pay $50 for it? probably not.
dedene将近 13 年前
Is there something like the Zen Coding as in Sublime Text 2 possible with Chocolat?
EternalFury将近 13 年前
For real? $49?<p>You have all that and so much more in jEdit for $0.
评论 #4174982 未加载
zhuzhuor将近 13 年前
cross-platform wins everything
评论 #4173127 未加载
septerr将近 13 年前
what languages does it support?
icefox将近 13 年前
Can we have the title changed to: Chocolate, a text editor for Mac 1.0 released
评论 #4173392 未加载
评论 #4176463 未加载