TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Microsoft and OpenAI's close partnership shows signs of fraying

326 点作者 jhunter10167 个月前

22 条评论

cbarrick7 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;Bas23" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;Bas23</a>
mikeryan7 个月前
While technical AI and LLMs are not something I’m well versed in. So as I sit on the sidelines and see the current proliferation of AI startups I’m starting to wonder where the moats are outside of access to raw computing power. Open AI seemed to have a massive lead in this space but that lead seems to be shrinking every day.
评论 #41878843 未加载
评论 #41878784 未加载
评论 #41881606 未加载
评论 #41882000 未加载
评论 #41886133 未加载
评论 #41886010 未加载
评论 #41878809 未加载
评论 #41880703 未加载
评论 #41887349 未加载
评论 #41885618 未加载
mark_l_watson7 个月前
Fun watching this all unfold.<p>I am starting to suspect that LLMs, short term for a few years, will end up mostly having value as assistants to experts in their fields who know how to prompt and evaluate output.<p>I see an ocean of startups doing things like ‘AI accounting systems’ that scare me a little. I just don’t feel good having LLM based systems making unsupervised important decisions.<p>I do love designing and writing software with LLMs, but that is supervised activity that save me a ton of time. I also enjoy doing fun things with advanced voice mode for ChatGPT, like practicing speaking in French - again, a supervised activity.<p>re: ownership of IP: I find the idea hilarious that by OpenAI declaring ‘AGI achieved!’ that Microsoft might get cut out of IP rights it has supposedly paid for.
评论 #41887928 未加载
评论 #41888192 未加载
WithinReason7 个月前
Does OpenAI have any fundamental advantage beyond brand recognition?
评论 #41882479 未加载
评论 #41881647 未加载
评论 #41882221 未加载
评论 #41880635 未加载
评论 #41880834 未加载
评论 #41881764 未加载
评论 #41881926 未加载
评论 #41883128 未加载
评论 #41878633 未加载
评论 #41883207 未加载
评论 #41883076 未加载
评论 #41878979 未加载
评论 #41881720 未加载
评论 #41882695 未加载
评论 #41881554 未加载
qwertox7 个月前
OpenAI would deserve to get dumped by MS. Just like &quot;the boss&quot; dumped everyone, including his own principles.<p>Maybe that&#x27;s why Sam Altman is so eager to get billions and build his own datacenters.
评论 #41883150 未加载
评论 #41883876 未加载
justahuman747 个月前
It&#x27;s 100% unsurprising that two companies that aren&#x27;t completely controlled by the same investors are having friendship issues
stephencoyner7 个月前
For folks who are skeptical about OpenAI&#x27;s potential, I think Brad Gerstner does a really good job representing the bull case for them (his firm Altimeter was a major investor in their recent round).<p>- They reached their current revenue of ~$5B about 2.5 years faster than Google and about 4.5 years faster than Facebook<p>- Their valuation to forward revenue (based on current growth) is inline with where Google and Facebook IPO&#x27;d<p>He explains it all much better than I could type - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;ePfNAKopT20?si=kX4I-uE0xDeAaWXN&amp;t=80" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;ePfNAKopT20?si=kX4I-uE0xDeAaWXN&amp;t=80</a>
评论 #41888160 未加载
评论 #41886152 未加载
dzonga7 个月前
why would teh relationship fray ? when microsoft has openAI by the balls. They just don&#x27;t own it &quot;legally&quot; due to monopoly concerns from DOJ. But they own it. Remember microsoft is entitled to 49% of OpenAI&#x27;s profits till they recoup their investment. That&#x27;s like the protection fee you pay to the mafia boss.
tylerchilds7 个月前
i remember satya saying “we have all the rights and capabilities” once microsoft believed they owned sam.<p>not a healthy dynamic.
TrapLord_Rhodo7 个月前
New York Times is suing Open AI... Take all this conjecture with a grain of salt... There&#x27;s alllloooottt of hearsay in this article.
Roark667 个月前
&gt;OpenAI plans to loose $5 billion this year<p>Let that sink in for anyone that has incorporated Chatgpt in their work routines to the point their normal skills start to atrophy. Imagine in 2 years time OpenAI goes bust and MS gets all the IP. Now you can&#x27;t really do your work without ChatGPT, but it cost has been brought up to how much it really costs to run. Maybe $2k per month per person? And you get about 1h of use per day for the money too...<p>I&#x27;ve been saying for ages, being a luditite and abstaining from using AI is not the answer (no one is tiling the fields with oxen anymore either). But it is crucial to at the very least retain 50% of capability hosted models like Chatgpt offer locally.
评论 #41878719 未加载
评论 #41881938 未加载
评论 #41880860 未加载
评论 #41878683 未加载
评论 #41882059 未加载
评论 #41878631 未加载
评论 #41878635 未加载
评论 #41878824 未加载
评论 #41878725 未加载
评论 #41878727 未加载
评论 #41881556 未加载
评论 #41878984 未加载
评论 #41883088 未加载
评论 #41883171 未加载
评论 #41878717 未加载
评论 #41878813 未加载
评论 #41885425 未加载
评论 #41878699 未加载
评论 #41883046 未加载
评论 #41880934 未加载
cynicalpeace7 个月前
I&#x27;m betting against OpenAI. Sam Altman has proven himself and his company untrustworthy. In long running games, untrustworthy players lose out.<p>If you disagree, I would argue you have a very sad view of the world, where truth and cooperation are inferior to lies and manipulation.
评论 #41882946 未加载
评论 #41882366 未加载
评论 #41882502 未加载
评论 #41882775 未加载
评论 #41884385 未加载
评论 #41883435 未加载
评论 #41883261 未加载
评论 #41883233 未加载
评论 #41883475 未加载
评论 #41882707 未加载
评论 #41883825 未加载
评论 #41883560 未加载
评论 #41883665 未加载
评论 #41883612 未加载
评论 #41882720 未加载
评论 #41882351 未加载
评论 #41883868 未加载
solarkraft7 个月前
How come I rarely see news about Anthropic? Aren’t they the closest competitor to ChatGPT with Claude? Or is LLama just so good that all the other inference providers without own products (Groq, Cerebras) are equally interesting right now?
评论 #41881285 未加载
评论 #41881158 未加载
评论 #41881226 未加载
评论 #41881291 未加载
评论 #41883356 未加载
评论 #41881447 未加载
评论 #41881125 未加载
dekhn7 个月前
Microsoft&#x27;s goal here is to slowly extract every bit of unique ML capability out of OpenAI (note the multiple mentions about IP and security wrt MSFT employees working with OpenAI) so that they can compete with Google to put ML features in their products.<p>When they know they have all the crown jewels, they will reduce then eliminate their support of OpenAI. This was, is, and will be a strategic action by Satya.<p>&quot;Embrace, extend, and extinguish&quot;. We&#x27;re in the second stage now.
评论 #41884093 未加载
neilv7 个月前
Who initiated this story, and what is their goal?<p>Both MS and Altman are famous for manipulation.<p>(Is it background to negotiations with each other? Or one party signaling in response to issues that analysts already raised? Distancing for antitrust? Distancing for other partnerships? Some competitor of both?)
评论 #41881582 未加载
评论 #41880911 未加载
jampekka7 个月前
So the plan is to make AI not-evil by doing it with Microsoft and Oracle?
评论 #41880920 未加载
strangattractor7 个月前
M$ is just having a &quot;Oh I just bought Twitter for how much?&quot; moment.
评论 #41887978 未加载
评论 #41880915 未加载
bansheeps7 个月前
I&#x27;m calling it right now: there&#x27;s a Microsoft&#x2F;OpenAI breakup imminent (over ownership, rights, GTM etc) that&#x27;s going to be extremely contested and cause OpenAI to go into a Stability AI type tailspin.
评论 #41884096 未加载
twoodfin7 个月前
Stay for the end and the hilarious idea that OpenAI’s board could declare one day that they’ve created AGI simply to weasel out of their contract with Microsoft.
评论 #41878982 未加载
评论 #41880653 未加载
评论 #41878980 未加载
评论 #41880775 未加载
farrelle257 个月前
This reporting style seems unusual. Haven&#x27;t noticed it before...(listing the number of people):<p><pre><code> - according to four people familiar with the talks ... - according to interviews with 19 people familiar with the relationship ... - according to five people with knowledge of his comments. - according to two people familiar with Microsoft’s plans. - according to five people familiar with the relationship ... - according to two people familiar with the call. - according to seven people familiar with the discussions. - six people with knowledge of the change said... - according to two people familiar with the company’s plan. - according to two people familiar with the meeting... - according to three people familiar with the relationship.</code></pre>
评论 #41878668 未加载
评论 #41880671 未加载
评论 #41881132 未加载
评论 #41880928 未加载
uptownfunk7 个月前
Sam is a scary good guy. But I’ve also learned to never underestimate Microsoft. They’ve been playing the game a long long time.
评论 #41881667 未加载
ein0p7 个月前
This is NYT, so there’s about 95% chance they made it all up for clicks. And you’re giving them clicks.