I don't quite understand why the authors consider their experiment a solid, novel evidence to alter safety standards, short for them imagining women shoving up Qi chargers into their uterus.<p>That said, I'm also unfamiliar with those mysterious "present safety standards" that "solely consider the thermal-effect of RM-EMF", so I can't even tell if that is actually true. The reason I'm even doubting that it is, because the field of photochemistry is like... pretty established. You'd think EM radiation resulting in heightened ROS production and other health effects are not missed by academia and regulation by now. Especially considering that this is the exact mechanism behind one of the most well known EM radiation health concerns, UV-radiation.