TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why the B-52 is outliving newer bombers [video]

26 点作者 jasoncartwright7 个月前

4 条评论

class3shock7 个月前
From the video:<p>1. Over engineered<p>2. More generic design choices (easy to upgrade)<p>3. Continued support to upgrade it and keep it relevant<p>4. &quot;the crew concept&quot; (not really sure how this supports the title claim)<p>In general it&#x27;s almost always cheaper and less risky to reuse something than to start from scratch and design&#x2F;build something new. The downside is the longer between clean sheet designs, the more knowledge is lost on how to design something from scratch.
评论 #41890896 未加载
jauntywundrkind7 个月前
I love how the landing gear can point in a different direction than the plane, allowing it to land semi-sideways. Useful during cross-eind conditions.
96597 个月前
On paper, this all makes a lot of sense. What is going to happen when these airplanes start falling out of the sky because they are just too old?<p>50 years is a long time for a piece of machinery. There will be many failure modes that will be discovered in these planes.<p>The C-130 was thought to last forever. Until about 10 years ago, well used planes being used for firefighting starting having structural failure in flight. Suddenly, organizations flying the older airframes decided that it was no longer effective to take the risk of failure.
评论 #41893271 未加载
评论 #41911061 未加载
pulse77 个月前
New is not necessarily better...