TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A Controversial Rare-Book Dealer Tries to Rewrite His Own Ending

81 点作者 acabal7 个月前

7 条评论

brg7 个月前
Charges dropped.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2024&#x2F;03&#x2F;06&#x2F;nyregion&#x2F;don-henley-eagles-dismissed.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2024&#x2F;03&#x2F;06&#x2F;nyregion&#x2F;don-henley-eagle...</a>
评论 #41912062 未加载
a1o7 个月前
This magazine shows a pop that makes Safari ignore the gesture to go back, can&#x27;t scroll up to go back to the address bar. For people using Safari on iPhone, is there any secret gesture to kill a tab like this?
评论 #41915694 未加载
评论 #41912516 未加载
评论 #41914887 未加载
评论 #41913568 未加载
blantonl7 个月前
Just enough admiration by the author to make someone think they should be like this guy, and approaching life like him is appropriate.<p>Walking away after reading that article, I don&#x27;t know whether or not to be appalled, or intrigued by the intricacies of the book collecting world and this dude.<p>One thing is for certain, if someone owed me six figures and they just hand waved it away with a slight of hand, I&#x27;d start throwing some chairs.
hristov7 个月前
What a scumbag. Make sure to read to the end of the article to read about things that he undoubtedly stole. Good job by the New Yorker journalist getting to the bottom of things and not being charmed by this psychopath. Very good article overall.<p>It is very depressing to see large public and non profit institutions be snowed in by his showmanship and spending millions of their funds on this glorified celebrity worship. It is good for museums to have letters of famous writers and their notes and such but it is an absolute waste for them to pay millions when they can pay hundreds of thousands. For most of these archives it seems that most and all bidders would be public or non profit institutions. Why would they outbid each other to waste more public or non profit money? In many cases it seems like there was no competitive bidding at all, horowitz merely came in with a crazy high price and they agreed to it. If they had a bit of a back bone they could have done the deals for much less.<p>But it was quite hilarious to read how he convinced other thieves to buy his overpriced collections. I can imagine his sales pitch “you will be so respected if you become an antique books and manuscripts collector! You will be the cream of society. They will forget about your business dealings.”
评论 #41925152 未加载
评论 #41916857 未加载
fergie7 个月前
A well written article, but it could probably have been like 10% of the length.
评论 #41915945 未加载
评论 #41915543 未加载
tptacek7 个月前
&quot;Keenly attuned to his guests’ networks and net worths&quot; is a cute turn of phrase.<p>Watch out for this story, it&#x27;ll suck you in.
评论 #41911589 未加载
评论 #41911388 未加载
parkcedar7 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;v4CBl" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;v4CBl</a>