TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Who is hacking Internet Archive?

36 点作者 weallfeelit7 个月前
apparently a &quot;pro-Palestinian&quot; group SN_BlackMeta claimed responsibility for the attack. SN_BlackMeta has previously been linked to an attack against a Middle Eastern financial institution earlier this year, and a security firm has linked it to a pro-Palestinian hacktivist movement. but what does this have to do with the Internet Archive? and even if it&#x27;s not SN_BlackMeta, what&#x27;s the angle? i can&#x27;t imagine any citizen being opposed to one of the only sources of truth on the internet.<p>there&#x27;s also, as always, some chatter about Big Tech or Big Govt. the question remains open. who is hacking Internet Archive, and what do they want?

11 条评论

ryandv7 个月前
&gt; i can&#x27;t imagine any citizen being opposed to one of the only sources of truth on the internet.<p>You can&#x27;t think of any incentive for compromising an authoritative source of truth and the historical record?
darksaints7 个月前
I have been down quite a few rabbit holes recently regarding trump and his ties to saudi arabia, and one thing that I constantly run into is corrupted archive data in articles about either Mohammad Bin Salman or Al Waleed bin Talal Al Saud. Now I&#x27;m more convinced than ever that Saudi Arabia has some sort of hand in this.
rjzzleep7 个月前
What an absurd claim.<p>Part of the atrocities being documented in gaza, the wetbank are Lebanon are documented through the internet archive. The other day the Jerusalem post removed an article called “is lebanon part of the promised land”.<p>The other group that has been actively involved in clearing their tracks are the pro Ukraine Warhawk media organizations both of those parties heavily supported by the US state department.
benoau7 个月前
It&#x27;s such a suspicious target IMHO, there&#x27;s got to be approximately zero financial value in attacking them, the vast majority of people are unaffected by its availability or lack of, it would be an inefficient distribution platform for malware or propaganda because it&#x27;s so niche.<p>I wonder if they actually made a mistake and hacked the wrong site.
评论 #41941307 未加载
Havoc7 个月前
No idea who but it’s giving strong “this is why we can’t have nice things” vibes.
rossdavidh7 个月前
1) no idea, but...<p>2) possible reason is not just to hack I.A. itself, but also to gain notoriety by hacking something both publicly known and not as well funded as a bank or government or whatnot
评论 #41941279 未加载
solarized7 个月前
Believing 100% without skepticism are bad way to get the conclusion.<p>* Are you sure it is pro palestinian org ?<p>* Are you sure that org not a puppets created by the Publisher who hated IA ?<p>So many possible questions.
评论 #41941477 未加载
djbusby7 个月前
And besides donating money what else can we do to help them (IA)? Make more archivers? Distributed? IPFS? How to ensure content integrity&#x2F;trust?
评论 #41941489 未加载
dancemethis7 个月前
My bet is on hired thugs by Hachette.
Saphyel7 个月前
IA is hacking itself (or trying to look like)<p>They lost big cases so IA won&#x27;t survive long anyway
warward7 个月前
jo