These two (distinct from each other) articles are found down the rabbit hole of links from the one posted:<p><a href="https://archive.ph/D0xQr" rel="nofollow">https://archive.ph/D0xQr</a><p><a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/tsmcs-labor-practices-draw-serious-concern-in-arizona-the-companys-new-chip-plant-allegedly-struck-by-worker-abuses" rel="nofollow">https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/tsmcs-labor-pract...</a><p>They discuss the culture clash between Taiwanese managers brought in to oversee rampup of the US fab vs. local hires - with different expectations in working hours / availability, role flexibility and tolerance of mistakes - to the point where some of the latter are quitting with allegations of workplace abuse.<p>I'm curious if either of those have already been discussed on HN, and whether anyone here worked there and have shared their views.<p>I'm really curious whether cultures seen as having a more "hardcore" work ethic (be it other countries, or startups and certain corporations like SpaceX within our own) correlate with more successful results, and whether the 4% result in this article counters that idea.