TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Are rotary mixers better?

32 点作者 daledavies7 个月前

10 条评论

jonesjohnson7 个月前
The title is a bit misleading IMHO. It&#x27;s more like analog vs digital. After all, from an electrical point of view they&#x27;re usually just potentiometers and you can build them either as rotary or as linear potentiometers, but it&#x27;s just a wiper on a resistive conductive track... (of course there are exceptions that work differently and use hall effect or optical sensors).<p>The article only talks about the actual circuit that is behind that potentiometer.<p>Having built some MIDI controllers myself in the past, I noticed that rotary potentiometers allow you to better &quot;decouple&quot; arm&#x2F;shoulder movements from hand&#x2F;finger movements. I.e. when you&#x27;re standing and and holding that knob, It&#x27;s easier to make precise adjustments when there&#x27;s a rotary knob you can &quot;hold on to&quot; and slowly twist your fingers, whereas with a linear potentiometer I usually have to keep a finger on the surface next to the knob to &quot;compensate&quot; for involuntary movements coming from my body and arm...
评论 #41960913 未加载
评论 #41961991 未加载
评论 #41961012 未加载
intsunny7 个月前
How an entire article about rotary mixers fails to mention Rane or their legendary MP2016 mixer is wild.<p>It became one of the most commonly available rotary mixers, was the house mixer for many NYC clubs, and one of the mixers commonly found on tech riders of DJs who were the last to transition to CDJs.<p>Random bit of trivia: if you see old school photos or videos of rotary mixers in American clubs, sometimes it wasn&#x27;t actually the Rane MP2016, but the Phazon SDX 3700: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.integralsound.com&#x2F;sdx-3700-mixer" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.integralsound.com&#x2F;sdx-3700-mixer</a> It was the house mixer for Tunnel&#x2F;Limelight.
dspig7 个月前
Any headline with a question... Of course it depends on what you want to do and what you are used to.<p>Technically, regardless of the rest of the product design there are high quality potentiometers available both as linear faders or rotary knobs. I guess dirt is more likely to get into a linear fader and make it scratchy - especially in a club environment.
letier7 个月前
I actually have a Taula 2 and a Xone 92 at home. I prefer the Taula 2, due to the simplicity and the fact that it has an isolator. The Xone 92 has a four band IQ and a filter, which I like a lot, but I have the impression that all the bells and whistles take a toll on the quality. At least in a home listening setup.<p>Anyways, it’s not the knobs that make the sound…
评论 #41960958 未加载
Animats7 个月前
What, no discussion of knob size, knurl, and operating torque?<p>At this point it&#x27;s mostly a user interface problem.
评论 #41960879 未加载
i_am_proteus7 个月前
Seems like ad copy for the recently-released Alpha Theta Euphonia.
评论 #41961864 未加载
blablablerg7 个月前
You can&#x27;t do (or it is much more involved) to do cuts with rotary knobs. So they serve only the DJ who does slow mixes, while with faders you can do both.
评论 #41962128 未加载
评论 #41960764 未加载
评论 #41960784 未加载
NikkiA7 个月前
Linear (travel, not resistance) pots are easier to clean, so no.
DidYaWipe7 个月前
Not in a computer UI.<p>It&#x27;s depressing that audio software still widely subjects users to this skeuomorphic failure, trying to do everything with on-screen &quot;knobs.&quot; Ugh.
评论 #41961038 未加载
评论 #41972314 未加载
评论 #41962119 未加载
评论 #41961096 未加载
jeffreygoesto7 个月前
Oh. I first thought it would be about blenders and thought &quot;what other principles would be there?&quot;
评论 #41961497 未加载
评论 #41962111 未加载
评论 #41961789 未加载
评论 #41961424 未加载
评论 #41961041 未加载