TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Boeing allegedly overcharged the military 8000% for airplane soap dispensers

4 点作者 ivewonyoung7 个月前

2 条评论

ggm7 个月前
When this comes up in NASA people point out you can&#x27;t sell one of anything, you sell a supply chain, compliance, OH&amp;S testing, documentation, poisons review, and a complete spec of the design of the moulds.<p>Because in 25 years time when somebody dies from a greeblie which grew in the nozzle of the soap dispenser, the DoD is not carrying the can, if they can prove the supplier did not a) test it for greeble growing and b) did not meet spec for said anti-greeble-growing protective features as may have been implied in the contract of terms.<p>You pay for the compliance to spec. If you want cheap, get some duck tape and tape a soap dispenser you bought at CVS to the mirror.<p>A book on the history of plastics talks about the first order for plastic bugles, and plastic sergeants whistles they made in world war 2: the savings in brass were significant at the scale of bugles and whistles bought for a 2 front war in Europe and Japan. The testing meant getting a master bugler and drill sergeant, to stand in the parade ground and do their thing, with a supervising officer confirming they made spec. But, they kept a brass-gold filigree wire, for the handle of the ceremonial sword, although they replaced the shagreen (shark skin leather) with pleather. You can&#x27;t cheapen everything.
评论 #42003684 未加载
bigfatkitten7 个月前
It&#x27;s probably the cheapest thing Uncle Sam ever bought from Boeing.