TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Byoyomi Explained (1997)

41 点作者 akkartik6 个月前

3 条评论

tromp6 个月前
Most Go players I know prefer the simplicity and elegance of Fischer time [1]. No more pausing the clock to count out N stones, or worries about using less time than allotted for your N moves and wasting the rest. I don&#x27;t mind seeing byoyomi become a relic of the past...<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;polgote.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;blog&#x2F;time-controls-go-byo-yomi-fischer-canadian&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;polgote.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;blog&#x2F;time-controls-go-byo-yomi-fische...</a>
评论 #42107607 未加载
评论 #42109284 未加载
评论 #42107264 未加载
评论 #42107034 未加载
评论 #42109449 未加载
pmontra6 个月前
&gt; byoyomi has all but been replaced by Canadian Overtime<p>Note that this is from 1997. It was common to use clocks in Europe that were unable to do proper Japanese style byoyomi and we did not have one timekeeper per board in tournaments. When I run out of time we paused the clock, I put for example 15 stones in front of me, closed the stone box, set my the clock for example to 10 minutes and start playing again. I would lose if I ended the time again with any stone left in front of me.<p>Clocks that could do byoyomi, and multiple rounds of it, started to be widespread not much after those years. I think we used them in the European Championship of 1996. A common byoyomi was 30 seconds per move. If I had one euro per each time I heard a clock saying &quot;30 seconds one time&quot; I&#x27;d be rich.
评论 #42107024 未加载
yakcyll6 个月前
All the time settings that are or were historically used in Go tournaments had their own quirks and idiosyncrasies that added charm to the time management issue. At the same time, I can understand the tediousness of Canadian being an argument not to use it anymore. Last time I played with it was at a tournament in Brussels where they were using old-school chess clocks, effectively making it the only viable solution.<p>Nowadays, as mentioned, Fischer trumps all with its simplicity, but some still enjoy playing with byoyomi (supported both by newer chess clocks and by old Ing clocks), since they got used to managing their thinking time in regular intervals once base time was spent. Personally, I&#x27;ve been advocating using Fischer for the longest time, since said management strategies were more natural to me in this case, and I&#x27;m glad DGT clocks became the common standard at tournaments now.
评论 #42109325 未加载