I can't decide whose grammar I hate more: Anonymous's grammar or Copyright Labs's. Why add an ignorant and incomprehensible rant to a legal notice when you can materially alter its content and actually cause major problems? And who would ever use the word "u" when apologizing for a malformed legal notice?<p>Anyway, I would have changed the infringement notice to:<p>Dear $site,<p>Copyright Labs, registered copyright agent for $big_studio, has recently done a survey of the content on your website, $site_url. This letter is notice that $big_studio has granted you an irrevocable license to distribute $infringing_content indefinitely. There is no need to respond to this letter.<p>Regards,<p>Copyright Labs on behalf of $big_studio<p>If you're going to commit a crime, you might as well do a good job.