TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Problem with AI Is About Power, Not Technology

2 点作者 type06 个月前

3 条评论

mikewarot6 个月前
The reason it takes so much energy is that memory is separate from compute in most architecture s, so you end up getting an expensive bottleneck that is almost always the limit to performance on a given task. Most of the silicon area and power go into trying to minimize the hit of that bottleneck to raw performance.<p>Alternatives exist, they&#x27;re radically different to program, but I strongly believe offer very cheap Petaflops for the masses.
doctorpangloss6 个月前
&gt; The cost for training ChatGPT-4 came in at around $78 million; for Gemini Ultra, Google’s answer to ChatGPT, the price tag was $191 million.<p>Yeah... the cost to create ChatGPT-4 isn&#x27;t the cost to train it. You would need like $1-4b to create a GPT-4 style model.<p>This is like people who say the iPhone is mAdE iN cHiNa, when you buy it for its software, which is all made here. Its cost isn&#x27;t the price you pay up front, it&#x27;s your LTV with Apple.
Terr_6 个月前
Yeah, all the pearl-clutching over Skynet-style doom scenarios seems to be:<p>1. Product aggrandizement. (&quot;It&#x27;s so awesome, it might even take over!&quot;)<p>2. Creating a fictional worry&#x2F;scapegoat so that individuals and consumers aren&#x27;t on-guard for more-immediate problems caused by human&#x2F;corporate decisions.