TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Did scientists revive an extinct animal or just breed a less stripey zebra?

85 点作者 sbuttgereit6 个月前

6 条评论

pvg6 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;MN9bp" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;MN9bp</a>
lolinder6 个月前
&gt; “Even if they succeeded, the obvious question is, what would you do with it?” said Stuart Pimm, a professor at the conservation ecology research unit at the University of Pretoria in South Africa. “If you had a Woolly mammoth, you would put it in a cage. It’s a colossal exercise in ego.”<p>This is my thought about all these efforts. The mammoth people talk like it&#x27;s about a solution to climate change, but that&#x27;s obviously working backwards from their goal (revive the mammoth for reasons) to some sort of reasonable-sounding justification. They set out with different motivations in mind.<p>I&#x27;d ask the same question here: why try to bring back a species we already killed off? These won&#x27;t be descendants of the animals we killed, so it&#x27;s hardly a form of reparations. If it&#x27;s about preserving the ecosystems we already have, there have to be more efficient ways to do that than rebreeding less stripe zebras.<p>It&#x27;s hard not to see this as just the same impulse that led to the poodle: because we can and because it will look cool and draw attention and make money. The only difference is there&#x27;s a slight nostalgic bent to the aesthetic.
评论 #42110666 未加载
评论 #42108018 未加载
评论 #42108157 未加载
评论 #42108422 未加载
评论 #42108182 未加载
评论 #42107974 未加载
评论 #42107984 未加载
评论 #42110321 未加载
评论 #42112323 未加载
评论 #42107996 未加载
评论 #42107929 未加载
评论 #42108014 未加载
评论 #42110537 未加载
评论 #42111207 未加载
评论 #42113385 未加载
评论 #42114975 未加载
评论 #42108019 未加载
评论 #42111395 未加载
评论 #42114984 未加载
评论 #42109689 未加载
评论 #42112592 未加载
评论 #42110099 未加载
评论 #42108096 未加载
评论 #42111132 未加载
ksymph6 个月前
The question of &#x27;Why bring back extinct species?&#x27; is fundamentally the same as &#x27;Why save species from extinction?&#x27;. It&#x27;s unspoken but seems to be widely understood that biodiversity and preventing its permanent loss has inherent value. It sometimes has economic or ecological value too, or the potential in the future, but even when that&#x27;s not the case most would agree we should aim to minimize extinction of other animals - if for no other reason than it being easier to drive a species to extinction than revive any of the billions of extinct species out there. (at least for now)<p>It&#x27;s curious that the response to bringing back mammoths and less-stripey-zebras is so lukewarm when there&#x27;s very little of the same criticism directed at efforts to save obscure species that are in decline. Say it was discovered that a small herd of quagga had survived since we thought they died out in 1883, but without human intervention they will soon due to habitat loss. Imagine: &quot;Why would we want to save them? The world is inhospitable to them now, their population declined for a reason. They have no use to us, and their niche isn&#x27;t one that couldn&#x27;t be filled by living species that we could import. To keep them from going extinct would be a cruel and irrational act of ego.&quot;
评论 #42108782 未加载
评论 #42114263 未加载
评论 #42110808 未加载
评论 #42110840 未加载
TheRealPomax6 个月前
If your article has a question mark in the title, and you work for wapo, you haven&#x27;t done your job as a journalist.
评论 #42112229 未加载
anothernewdude6 个月前
&gt; Please enable JS and disable any ad blocker<p>Haha, no.
atourgates6 个月前
The real answer at the end of the article is, &quot;Maybe, we don&#x27;t know yet, but we will soon.&quot;<p>&gt; Some of the criticism of the Quagga Project could be put to rest next year. That’s when Annelin Molotsi, a molecular biologist working on the project, plans to sequence the genome of the re-bred quaggas.<p>&gt; “I think it will answer a lot of questions,” Molotsi said.
评论 #42107849 未加载