Watermark Anything

Invisible watermarks is just steganography. Once the exact method of embedding is known it is always possible to corrupt an existing watermark - however in some cases it may not be possible to tell if a watermark is present, such as if the extraction procedure always produces high entropy information even from unwatermaked content.

Link to the paper in the README is broken. I <i>believe</i> this is the correct link to the referenced paper: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2411.07231" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2411.07231</a>

I wonder what will come of all the creative technologists out there, trying to raise money to do &quot;Watermarking&quot; or &quot;Human Authenticity Badge,&quot; when Meta will just do all the hard parts for free: both the technology of robust watermarking, and building an insurmountable social media network that can adopt it unilaterally.

Is this a big deal? I&#x27;m a layman here so this seems like a needed product but I have a feeling I&#x27;m missing something.

What if the watermark becomes a latent variable that&#x27;s indirectly learnt by a subsequent model trained on its generated data? They will have to constantly vary the mark to keep it up to date. Are we going to see Merkle tree watermark database like we see for certificate transparency? YC, here&#x27;s your new startup idea.

Does this watermark still work if someone screenshots an image?

Now we need a link to the &quot;Unwatermark Anything&quot; repo

These can be easily jailbroken by quantizing the weights lower.

oh I was kind of hoping this would also watermark text imperceptibly... alas this doesn&#x27;t do that

It&#x27;s a faid carbon

I have just positive feelings about facebook recently, big power, open mindset