TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Two Nobel Prize winners want to cancel their own CRISPR patents in Europe

167 点作者 thisismytest6 个月前

8 条评论

bawolff6 个月前
I feel like this is missing the why of it all.<p>They aren&#x27;t cancelling the patents because of some ethical medicine-must-be-free reason. They are cancelling them because they are about to be revoked. A sort of, you-can&#x27;t-fire-me-if-i-quit-first move.<p>But why? Is there some sort of precedent they are seeking to avoid? Is this just them giving in the towel and looking to avoid further legal fees? Why are they cancelling instead of just letting the process play out?
评论 #42165629 未加载
评论 #42162838 未加载
评论 #42165484 未加载
akira25016 个月前
&gt; In the US, the Broad Institute has also been selling licenses to use CRISPR.<p>Including patents owned by MIT, no? It feels like this could use a disclosure and some additional context to understand where the incentives here are. I&#x27;ve walked away feeling like I know less after having read this.
评论 #42163205 未加载
评论 #42163146 未加载
moralestapia6 个月前
Patents shouldn&#x27;t exist at all, IMO.<p><i>&quot;But they make innovation thrive by providing an incentive to blah blah blah&quot;</i>.<p>Not anymore in this day and age. Money comes mostly from the government, anyway, and plenty of really smart researchers would just be happy to put out their stuff out for the public benefit (and already do, btw). Even if they didn&#x27;t the current patent system ends up giving them like 1% of profits, lol.<p>The business case for &quot;but I want to protect the market I created&quot; can be sufficiently solved with trade secrets and trademarks. Patents sound nice in theory, but in practice they only hinder innovation, the opposite of what they&#x27;re supposed to do.
评论 #42163184 未加载
评论 #42163498 未加载
评论 #42165426 未加载
diego_moita6 个月前
&gt; against Feng Zhang, a researcher at the Broad Institute of MIT<p>Bear in mind: this article is published by a magazine that belongs to MIT.
评论 #42162969 未加载
jpcom6 个月前
Partial bribery of the court? Two Nobel Laureates have to cancel their patents that excluded the &quot;obvious&quot; Protospacer Adjacent Motifs (PAMs).
mediumsmart6 个月前
Great find, that site was missing in my etc&#x2F;hosts collection.
ixaxaar6 个月前
What a sad fucking world. I like what China does in the regard to patents. That is exactly what patents deserve.
评论 #42163357 未加载
评论 #42164305 未加载
评论 #42162389 未加载
评论 #42162150 未加载
impish92086 个月前
Dupe: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41649354">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41649354</a>