TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The X (Twitter) to Bluesky Exodus

11 点作者 alex_suzuki6 个月前

2 条评论

anonzzzies6 个月前
For me the algorithms work better. I get way too much rubbish on Twitter even though I don't follow or want to know these people or that information.
评论 #42221648 未加载
评论 #42221302 未加载
libertine6 个月前
This video about the decline of X and the onboarding of propaganda bots explains this phenomenon quite well, especially if you follow the timeline of events: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=GZ5XN_mJE8Y" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=GZ5XN_mJE8Y</a><p>Coincidentally or not, it was marked by Elon Musk&#x27;s takeover of Twitter.<p>At the end of the video, Benn states that he shared some of these insights with some news outlets that will take different spins on this story, so we&#x27;ll probably see some interesting developments on this over the next weeks!<p>Some questions that popped out:<p>- Should X be banned in the EU for the deliberate, or irresponsible practice of promoting and protecting the spread of misinformation?<p>- Should LLMs have security layers to prevent the automation of misinformation propaganda?<p>- Should it be mandatory to have human teams available to review reported content, and until content is approved, the content reach should be capped?<p>- None of this matters because users will naturally drop off the platform. But are they doing it on time to prevent damage?