TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

No More Storage Limits: M.2 Adapter for Apple's M1 MacBooks [video]

78 点作者 elisaado6 个月前

5 条评论

godelski6 个月前
1) I really like that there&#x27;s a lot more high technical skill videos coming out (I can link a few if others are interested and maybe we could grow a list?)<p>2) Apple makes a big stink about their carbon footprint and sustainability. It is on every product page. But Apple products are not very sustainable when you consider beyond materials. Remember it is &quot;Reduce, Reuse, Recycle&quot; (there&#x27;s 3 arrows on the recycle symbol for a reason!), and I&#x27;m concerned that a lot of the focus for green stuff has shifted to only the last R. They&#x27;re big fighters against the Right To Repair, meaning, they are against Reduce. They also really lock down the OS (especially on iPhones) meaning it is difficult to Reuse.<p>I am a bit of a hypocrite, as I&#x27;m now mostly on Apple (Air for laptop, switched to iPhone this month, but main machine is Linux). I switched because privacy, but I&#x27;m also mad about this loss (I felt that they have won, especially with overcharging...): But my old laptops? They become servers or machines I give to others. My old phones? Same thing. Your old phone is probably more powerful than a raspberry pi and comes with a battery backup, microphone, camera, and other things you might want. This is the __Reuse__ part of all of this.<p>Here&#x27;s the thing Apple:<p><pre><code> - If you want to &quot;go green&quot; you need the other R&#x27;s. Reduce and Reuse matter MORE than recycling! - If you want better products, stop blocking power users </code></pre> That second point is tied in, and important for the reuse aspect. And you know what? I&#x27;m willing to bet that if Apple does this, they would actually make more money (as the video joked about). Because this is a big reason people turned to Apple in the first place. Because the machines lasted longer, people were willing to pay more. Programmers preferred them because they were the most linux like.<p>You were the first trillion dollar company, the first 2 trillion dollar company, and the first 3 trillion dollar company. But you&#x27;re losing your place. It&#x27;s time to think different.
评论 #42233763 未加载
评论 #42238634 未加载
评论 #42232668 未加载
fourfour36 个月前
Worth noting - this is <i>not</i> a m.2 adapter, you couldn&#x27;t use it to attach standard drives. This is an adapter for fitting proprietary flash cards with NAND on.
评论 #42243966 未加载
dlevine6 个月前
This is super impressive! It&#x27;s a cool POC, although it is already clear that it would be feasible for Apple to put M.2 slots in Macbooks if they wanted to.<p>I wonder how much it would cost to have someone replace the BGA NAND chips in my Macbook. Apple charges $6-800 for a 2TB upgrade for a Macbook (depending on whether it&#x27;s a 250 or 500GB drive originally). Someone would have to be able to do it for like $2-300 for it to be a feasible upgrade, especially considering that my warranty would be void. I assume there are people overseas who could do it cheaply. I assume it would be fairly quick for someone who knows what they are doing.
评论 #42244008 未加载
评论 #42232417 未加载
评论 #42232486 未加载
cf100clunk6 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41971060">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41971060</a>
bastard_op6 个月前
Ok, so you upgraded the storage, but most of these as well use soldered memory too, not to mention a _lot_ of these ship with _only_ base 8gb of ram. I imagine they&#x27;ll run out of ram at some point, when apple will deprecate even m1-3 &quot;low-end&quot; 8gb macs to obscurity with the intel variants now that their low-end is 16gb.<p>How much is too much to upgrade a system vs replacing it and paying more apple tax?<p>Better ROI making them run linux in a less-needy desktop environment than trying to keep them usable as a mac with macos.
评论 #42232636 未加载