TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Heaviside’s Operator Calculus (2007)

83 点作者 joebig5 个月前

9 条评论

btilly5 个月前
For a more current example of a mathematical technique that preceded formalization by a considerable amount, consider renormalization. Particularly renormalization over a calculation that takes place over Feynman diagrams.<p>For decades physicists were happily using this to predict experiment, while mathematicians were tearing their hair out trying to make some formal sense of this, even if only in a limited context. I&#x27;d have to do some poking around to find out whether mathematicians are happy about it yet, even though the idea is older than I am.
评论 #42296716 未加载
评论 #42293660 未加载
dang5 个月前
Related:<p><i>Heaviside’s Operator Calculus</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=569934">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=569934</a> - April 2009 (6 comments)<p>This is also interesting: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.johndcook.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2022&#x2F;10&#x2F;12&#x2F;operational-calculus&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.johndcook.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2022&#x2F;10&#x2F;12&#x2F;operational-calcul...</a> (via <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33179121">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33179121</a>, but no comments there)
评论 #42290168 未加载
shae5 个月前
This author published my favorite book on mental math, called Dead Reckoning, you might like it!
mcnamaratw5 个月前
Great. Possibly missed the opportunity to point out that Heaviside’s method is more or less the same as Laplace transforms.
评论 #42290283 未加载
codr75 个月前
There are several similar variants of different kinds of math that make just as much sense as mainstream methods to me. It all feels very arbitrary.<p>I think that&#x27;s what got me into software. If we&#x27;re just making shit up either way, then useful artifacts is a nice bonus.
评论 #42290598 未加载
评论 #42290683 未加载
selecsosi5 个月前
I always loved that the derivative of the heavyside operator is equivalent to the dirac delta operator. The idea of impulse and how to apply that to a system is such a unique and useful unlock in E&amp;M and has such a nice analog of connecting the circuit.<p>One of those things that made it click for me that math truly is defined rules of operations over definitions and could be constructed as to be useful for us, and not just a handed down pure concept. We need to model this very specific thing, here&#x27;s an operator for it.
评论 #42292035 未加载
01jonny015 个月前
Gosh this takes me back to my EEE degree. Very difficult to understand at first, way to abstract if you have not seen the electromagnetic phenomena play out in real life and you are not well versed in engineering mathematics.
joebig5 个月前
Kennelly–Heaviside layer<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Kennelly%E2%80%93Heaviside_layer" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Kennelly%E2%80%93Heaviside_lay...</a>
bubblyworld5 个月前
Beautiful, I love the irreverence. Reminds me a lot of the &quot;umbral calculus&quot; for computing combinatorial identities. It proceeds in much the same way - deliberately make an (unjustified) abuse of notation, work with it at face value regardless, and reap the rewards...<p>...or spend hours debugging the mess you&#x27;ve made if it doesn&#x27;t work =P