It's worth noting that this lab has a lot of patents: <a href="https://yaghi.berkeley.edu/publications.html#patent" rel="nofollow">https://yaghi.berkeley.edu/publications.html#patent</a><p>It's not clear that this particular chemical is subject to a patent application, but they have applied for a patent on the entire class of chemicals: <a href="https://patents.google.com/patent/US20220370981A1" rel="nofollow">https://patents.google.com/patent/US20220370981A1</a><p>I'm conflicted about this. while I'm skeptical about most patents this is exactly the kind of invention that patents are supposed to incentivise, and this guy obviously deserves a reward if his invention, like, literally saves the world. But - reading between the lines, while it's effective, it sounds like it's not yet <i>cost effective</i>. And making something cost effective is exactly the kind of thing that patents that restrict development to a single lab (which is what a class patent will do) will cause problems with.<p>Probably the best answer would be for someone rich to buy him out and licence it for free.