TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

China completes green belt around Taklamakan Desert

193 点作者 uprootdev6 个月前

10 条评论

bloopernova6 个月前
It took 46 years to create the 1,900 mile, ~3060 km green belt around the 130,350 square miles (337,600 km2) desert. The linked article doesn&#x27;t say anything about negatives, but the positives seem to be very beneficial for the area.<p>I really wish other major powers would commit to similar projects. In my opinion, communities need larger goals to strive towards, to provide a sense of continued belonging and reinvestment for the future.
评论 #42358170 未加载
评论 #42358356 未加载
评论 #42358942 未加载
评论 #42361112 未加载
评论 #42359384 未加载
评论 #42362193 未加载
评论 #42359590 未加载
评论 #42362241 未加载
评论 #42358181 未加载
skybrian6 个月前
I wonder whether this is working, as far as preventing desertification goes. The project has critics. It might just the state declaring victory?<p>Edit: apparently it’s controversial.<p>Will China’s “green Great Wall” save it from encroaching sands?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.economist.com&#x2F;china&#x2F;2024&#x2F;12&#x2F;05&#x2F;will-chinas-green-great-wall-save-it-from-encroaching-sands" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.economist.com&#x2F;china&#x2F;2024&#x2F;12&#x2F;05&#x2F;will-chinas-green...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;FVimm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;FVimm</a>
评论 #42358914 未加载
评论 #42359196 未加载
评论 #42358879 未加载
soneca6 个月前
&gt; <i>”The initiative combines solar-powered sand-blocking technology with extensive vegetation planting to stabilize the desert’s edges.”</i><p>What sand-blocking tech is that? Does anyone know?
评论 #42359145 未加载
评论 #42358955 未加载
评论 #42358905 未加载
评论 #42361913 未加载
评论 #42360216 未加载
ilamont6 个月前
I&#x27;ve been to Turpan and the Tarim Basin area, which is on the northeast edge of the desert. It&#x27;s the only place I&#x27;ve witnessed a sandstorm, and it&#x27;s very hot ... local people told me not to leave rented bikes parked in sunlight as the tires were at risk of bursting.<p>Many centuries ago, local Uyghur people developed ingenious mechanisms to channel snowmelt from the northern mountains for irrigation ... basically covered stone channels that stretch for thousands of miles and enable crops like grapes and melons to be grown. In Turpan itself, grape trellises are grown over many sidewalks which cools pedestrians and looks quite nice.
asdf123qweasd6 个月前
Shouldn&#x27;t you be able to see that on sattelit pictures?
评论 #42359238 未加载
mlinksva6 个月前
Very interesting topic but the article strikes me as being blogspam adjacent.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Great_Green_Wall_(China)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Great_Green_Wall_(China)</a> cites <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.yahoo.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;china-completes-3-000-km-112549261.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.yahoo.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;china-completes-3-000-km-11254926...</a> which is one of many press articles that only cites (but does not link) state media.<p>The Economist has paywalled writeup <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.economist.com&#x2F;china&#x2F;2024&#x2F;12&#x2F;05&#x2F;will-chinas-green-great-wall-save-it-from-encroaching-sands" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.economist.com&#x2F;china&#x2F;2024&#x2F;12&#x2F;05&#x2F;will-chinas-green...</a> that is a bit skeptical of the project&#x27;s impact (unlinked claims at least half due to increased rain, not human efforts) and sustainability (also unlinked, but I&#x27;d guess correct, it seems somewhat similar projects such as the great plains shelterbelt in the US decline unless maintained).<p>Surely there must be an afforestation&#x2F;macro ecological engineering geek out there who has blogged on this in depth, would love to read it!
评论 #42360931 未加载
65106 个月前
The west should help fund this and we should hint at other sand hills in the world to do the same.
ashoeafoot6 个月前
Im sure the reality on the ground will be less disappointing with these than it was with the claims of russian aemy to be the 2nd mighty in the world. Those autoritarians would never lie to us.
jmyeet6 个月前
China may well have replaced the USSR as the latest bogeyman to keep attention away from whatever war crimes the US is currently supporting or committing, but all I can think about is the ~$10T spent on and millions of lives lost to the &quot;War on Terror&quot; and what could&#x27;ve been done with the money instead.<p>I mean just look at the high speed rail transformation in 16 years [1].<p>China is not without its issues but neither is the US government and at least China is investing in long-term infrastructure for their people. Chinese foreign policy is also considerably less damaging than American foreign policy.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;MapPorn&#x2F;comments&#x2F;xszhbm&#x2F;chinese_highspeed_railway_map_2008_vs_2020&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;MapPorn&#x2F;comments&#x2F;xszhbm&#x2F;chinese_hig...</a>
评论 #42359072 未加载
评论 #42358552 未加载
评论 #42359498 未加载
评论 #42358627 未加载
评论 #42358591 未加载
评论 #42358483 未加载
philosopher12346 个月前
Meanwhile the US uses it surpluses of wealth to do… what?<p>Optimize ad sales to 16 year olds and fund genocide in Gaza?
评论 #42358719 未加载
评论 #42358780 未加载
评论 #42358742 未加载