It'd be nice to see a bit of perspective on the sorts of corporate big shots now at risk - vs. the article's blanket FUD, and subtle equating of "corporate" and "Fortune 500-ish".<p>I recall similar simplistic FUD after the 9/11 attacks. From reading the articles back then, you'd have assumed that the top brass of Pete's Porta-Potty & Septic Service had all fled their 2-story HQ building, for fear that a 747 was going to crash into it at any moment.<p>EDIT: Also never mentioned is that a whole lotta power-hungry, rabble-rousing, and less-than-saintly politicians will be taking their oaths of office in the next month or so. Might some of them have noticed the hot new trend of publicly hating certain sorts of corporations and executives? And be busy thinking about ways in which they could "surf the wave" - legally, using their official powers - and advance their political careers thereby?