TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

It looks like OpenAI trained Sora on game content

21 点作者 alex_young5 个月前

5 条评论

patrickhogan15 个月前
The number of layers is irrelevant. It’s transformative. The author had to work hard just to get it to make non exact videos of similar videos.<p>Where it’s going to get interesting is in terms of service where companies start using AI to copy SaaS products by having an AI login and copy competitors features. This breaks not just copyright law but is a breach of contract.
评论 #42406987 未加载
评论 #42407939 未加载
IshKebab5 个月前
I don&#x27;t think there&#x27;s anything new here. It&#x27;s the same <i>unanswered</i> question of can you train AI on copyrighted material.<p>The fact that it&#x27;s video instead of photos or text doesn&#x27;t seem like it should make any difference.<p>We need to wait for the legal system to decide.
评论 #42407008 未加载
评论 #42412475 未加载
评论 #42406777 未加载
ALittleLight5 个月前
I think it&#x27;s clearly wrong to use generative AI, or any tool, to produce what are basically copies of a work, and then profit off that as if you were the original creator.<p>I think it&#x27;s just as clearly okay to use content that other people produce as part of learning to create your own stuff.<p>Generative AI can be used for copyright infringement - just like any creator technology could be.
评论 #42407174 未加载
starfleet_bop5 个月前
Is AI generated content any different from a human reading a bunch of books or watching movies and being inspired by them to create something similar but not identical?
almostgotcaught5 个月前
lol it&#x27;s going to be much harder to launder the training data for videos than for text and images. not that it matters legally but like who&#x27;s going to be that impressed by an app that so obviously produces facsimiles