TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Swedish minister eyes energy crisis steps, blames German nuclear phase-out

28 点作者 EvgeniyZh5 个月前

11 条评论

wkat42425 个月前
Easy to blame someone else. None of this is new, she's had more than enough time to compensate and Sweden is in the EU energy market by choice.
评论 #42429190 未加载
评论 #42429105 未加载
评论 #42429162 未加载
评论 #42429170 未加载
评论 #42429363 未加载
评论 #42429251 未加载
locallost5 个月前
In 2022 Germany&#x27;s nuclear plants produced 32.8 TWh of electricity, which was 6.4% of the load in that country [1].<p>Compared to 2022, the spot market prices in Germany are lower in both 2023 (significantly) and 2024. [2]<p>Seems a bit odd that the nuclear exit in Germany did not create large issues, but is wrecking havoc on Sweden.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;energy-charts.info&#x2F;charts&#x2F;energy&#x2F;chart.htm?l=en&amp;c=DE&amp;interval=year&amp;year=2022" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;energy-charts.info&#x2F;charts&#x2F;energy&#x2F;chart.htm?l=en&amp;c=DE...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;energy-charts.info&#x2F;charts&#x2F;price_average&#x2F;chart.htm?l=en&amp;c=DE&amp;year=2024" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;energy-charts.info&#x2F;charts&#x2F;price_average&#x2F;chart.htm?l=...</a>
评论 #42429421 未加载
评论 #42432470 未加载
dsign5 个月前
In Sweden, I&#x27;ve been in contact with several companies and associations which are raising small solar farms and selling stocks on them (so, there is a primary market for stocks on renewables). Investment is affordable and transparent and it feels &quot;grass-roots democratic&quot;. The problem with solar farms is that this time of the year, they don&#x27;t produce power. The only green alternative that would produce power is nuclear, and that one is out of reach for small private investors.... I don&#x27;t even know if nuclear power stocks would be available in a secondary market .
评论 #42429471 未加载
occz5 个月前
This is not a politician whose opinion anyone needs to take seriously. She&#x27;s a constant source of extremely bad takes, the latest of which being dismissing expert criticism of her governments extremely poor plan to subsidize new nuclear construction.<p>Fwiw, nuclear phase-out was a bad call in both Germany and Sweden. New nuclear construction is an equally or worse choice at this moment, with where renewables and storage are today and the trend they are on - prices are already beating nuclear by a large margin and are plummeting, while nuclear keeps getting more expensive each year.
wewxjfq5 个月前
Title is misleading. She criticizes Swedish energy policy. Her gripe with Germany is that they only have one price zone.
评论 #42429459 未加载
Ekaros5 个月前
How hard it is to build North South transfer capacity? I mean intra-Sweden capacity. My understanding is that Finland can buy power from the north and then move it to south effectively... And we don&#x27;t even produce that power...
评论 #42429318 未加载
评论 #42429249 未加载
评论 #42429442 未加载
评论 #42429119 未加载
willvarfar5 个月前
This blame game is all about supporting current political narratives about nuclear power etc. It&#x27;s not really about the energy crisis.<p>Sweden&#x27;s energy mess is all about &#x27;free markets&#x27;. Back in the old days the state-run energy companies in Sweden produced an overabundance of electricity, mostly from hydro, making Sweden one of the cheapest electricity countries in the world. It was really common to replace wood burners with direct electric radiators in old houses across Sweden.<p>Then the British conservative party (equiv to the current Swedish administration who the article is about), heavily into privatisation, started selling the public utilities. One thing they did was split network ownership from supplier, so you have one company owning trains and another owning track, and the same for electric net vs generation etc. This created a kind of artificial market, because you can&#x27;t actually choose with your feet what company has power lines to your house etc. So they invented energy markets and mock auctions and things.<p>Of course in hindsight all those privatisation thingies are no longer popular. But at the time the rest of Europe thought &#x27;oh that&#x27;s a good idea!&#x27;<p>Within Sweden the electricity is generally generated in the north and consumed in the south and the socialist governments with their nationalised utilitieshad a fixed cost in the whole country.<p>Interestingly it was the Danes who complained because they border the south of Sweden and can&#x27;t generate electricity nearly so cheaply so the cheap cost of Swedish electricity was &#x27;unfair competition&#x27;. In 2011 the Swedes had to scrap their fixed one-price policy and introduce &#x27;energy zones&#x27; that get increasingly more expensive as you approach Denmark.<p>Fast forward to today and we have Sweden producing more energy than it consumes, but the utility companies get more money from selling that abroad than at home, meaning the Swedes have to buy their electricity from abroad! We basically logically from a market perspective have electricty flowing out of Sweden to be sold by the utility companies and then back into Sweden to be consumed by households.<p>And we wonder why there is another winter fuel price shock warning in the offing!
评论 #42429332 未加载
评论 #42429366 未加载
评论 #42432796 未加载
评论 #42429254 未加载
评论 #42429365 未加载
Havoc5 个月前
Think must people agree it was a mistake but blaming infra country difference on another country seems a bit much
评论 #42429349 未加载
knorker5 个月前
Would have been a great opportunity to make money then by exporting their own nuclear power... if they hadn&#x27;t shut a bunch of it down.<p>Then they could have chosen to refund their own consumers, if that&#x27;s what they wanted.
评论 #42429219 未加载
评论 #42429350 未加载
pelorat5 个月前
A big problem with the &quot;green energy transition&quot; is that we&#x27;re more than happy to build large wind-parks and promote solar (well, not in Sweden so much, it&#x27;s dark in the winter), but we build little to no storage for it where surplus energy can be stored.
评论 #42429564 未加载
guappa5 个月前
Swedish government: &quot;We&#x27;ll only use electric cars!&quot;<p>Also swedish government: &quot;Please don&#x27;t vacuum or do laundry on cold days when everyone has extra heaters on&quot;<p>Also swedish government: &quot;Everyone&#x27;s income is public record!&quot;<p>Also swedish government: &quot;We&#x27;ll give money to people with large homes. The larger the home the more money they will get, because they have more costs for heating.&quot;<p>Also swedish government: &quot;This money is not income and not public record.&quot;<p>Sweden is a very corrupt capitalist country that is still riding the socialist image they created long ago. But that sweden died with olaf palme. Sweden today is a completely different thing.<p>Remember that the &quot;corruption index&quot; things are about perception, so if you have a good marketing department (and a police that never arrests anyone for corruption) your citizens will generally not know corruption exists.<p>I live in sweden. I&#x27;ve seen how police investigates corruption: &quot;pin everything on the immigrant cleaner and pretend the managers who signed the budget didn&#x27;t know anything about it&quot; is the strategy.<p>Also the widespread racism that makes most people believe swedish people are inherently honest and immigrants are genetically dishonest helps to sell the story :)<p>Before you downvote me, go live 10 years in sweden, learn the language and meet people who are born there.
评论 #42429406 未加载
评论 #42429393 未加载