BlackSheep: Fast ASGI web framework for Python

I enjoy building frameworks and libraries for fun, so kudos to you for that. At first glance, BlackSheep seems to combine the aspects of Flask, Django, and FastAPI. However, I’m a bit skeptical about its ability to coexist alongside them. The one feature I believe could drive the success of the next Python framework is the ability to operate in nogil mode.

What is the plus value vs a 'classical' equivalent like FastAPI ?

Another ASGI web framework mimicking the Flask API: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;pallets&#x2F;quart&#x2F;">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;pallets&#x2F;quart&#x2F;</a>

I&#x27;m building and maintaining Blazeio: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;anonyxbiz&#x2F;Blazeio">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;anonyxbiz&#x2F;Blazeio</a>. Blazeio is designed to handle massive concurrency with low response times and high requests per second. It utilizes a perishable buffer, discarding chunks as they are received, and operates with a single task throughout the entire request&#x2F;response cycle. In theory, Blazeio can scale to handle infinite concurrency. While Black Sheep crashes under heavy load, Blazeio continues to scale seamlessly and outperform it.

So much negativity here ... I like it very much. Browsing docs makes me want to code some backend in Python, which historically never been the case.

Are there any good alternatives to gunicorn out there that don&#x27;t require async? We&#x27;re not ready to migrate everything to async, but gunicorn&#x27;s forking model is blowing up on macOS 15.

Nobody seems to be asking why Python doesn&#x27;t have the equivalent of Go&#x27;s net&#x2F;http.<p>I think Django is justified given how powerful it is, but these micro-frameworks are ridiculous.

How does this compare to Litestar?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;litestar.dev" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;litestar.dev</a>

I was trying to see the value of this as well, but I don&#x27;t know Python well enough. Maybe there is no ASGI for python?<p>And I assume Python cannot handle it&#x27;s own HTTP server (using threads, similar to Javalin&#x27;s virtual threads)? I always cringe when a programming language needs to find another solution&#x2F;language to handling its processes. I understand why you will need a load balancer, but for small, simple projects, I like to contain things.

Feels like an in-between library that I&#x27;m not sure has a great fit in the current Python BE environment.<p>It&#x27;s not as batteries-included as Django, primarily because Django&#x27;s the incumbent and the ecosystem is vast.<p>It&#x27;s not as modular and independent as Flask, which it&#x27;s taking a lot of inspiration from.<p>It doesn&#x27;t seem to bring enough to the table to be flat out better all-rounder than FastAPI.<p>I&#x27;m quite unsure where I&#x27;d use it instead of one of those 3.<p>From searching through the documentation and trying to find it out, the primary &quot;secret sauce&quot; seems to be Dependency Injection, quite a hard sell for a Python framework.

what&#x27;s the difference between fastapi?

I’m worried about the psychological health of people that make stuff like this. Why? Nobody uses these frameworks unless paid, you need an actual team of people to maintain it.