TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: How to opt out of AI training in a license?

1 点作者 talles5 个月前
From my (quick) search, it seems like there&#x27;s no readily available license (or some sort of standard clause) to prevent an openly accessible codebase to be used for AI training.<p>Does anyone know of any existing repository out there that states this in their license? Any advice on how to do it?<p>P.S.: I’m specifically looking for how to include this restriction in a license, I kindly ask stay on topic here.<p>Thanks in advance!

2 条评论

minimaxir5 个月前
There&#x27;s nothing stopping you from <i>putting</i> a no-AI-training provision in your license. However, it&#x27;s functionally redundant with some licenses which implicitly disallow AI training anyways and would likely not be obeyed.<p>Whether it would give you legal standing to successfully sue anyone that did it anyways is still up for legal debate.
评论 #42455892 未加载
josephcsible5 个月前
AI companies use the argument &quot;what we&#x27;re doing is fair use, so we don&#x27;t need to follow the license&quot;. If that argument is valid, then you can&#x27;t because nothing you put in the license will apply to them anyway. If that argument is invalid, then basically every license* already does opt out, since basically every license* requires attribution, and the AI companies don&#x27;t give that.<p>* Even the extremely lax MIT license requires attribution. Basically the only licenses that don&#x27;t are public-domain equivalent ones like CC0, the Unlicense, and the WTFPL: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Public-domain-equivalent_license" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Public-domain-equivalent_licen...</a>