TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Why isn't there a startup that lets you pay to read paywalled articles?

3 点作者 nnurmanov4 个月前
As the title suggests, why is there not a single platform where I can pay once and access most paywalled articles? Currently, it seems paid newspapers are developing their own solutions, meaning I have to subscribe to each one individually to read the news. I’d much prefer a system where I make a single payment and can read individual articles or a selection of articles on demand.

3 条评论

solardev4 个月前
Google actually tried this, but it failed: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Google_Contributor" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Google_Contributor</a><p>Apple News+ does something similar: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.apple.com&#x2F;apple-news&#x2F;publications&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.apple.com&#x2F;apple-news&#x2F;publications&#x2F;</a><p>There&#x27;s another system like this: Your local library turns tax dollars into free books and articles, sometimes digital ones too. Worth checking. At the very least, many bigger ones have on-site (on their network) access to digital newspapers, journals, and magazines.<p>----------<p>I think it&#x27;s the same reason we used to have all streaming on Netflix, but now every content publisher has their own streaming service. They make more that way, presumably, and have a branded product rather than relying on some intermediary that blends them altogether into an amorphous blob of &quot;content&quot;.<p>They don&#x27;t want to see articles turn into generic commodities the way movies, games, and music already are. The newspaper industry is barely alive as it is, and losing money and people every year... maybe they&#x27;ll see another boost from the inevitable controversies of the new administration (again), as they did in 2016-2020, but short of that, it&#x27;s kinda a dying industry with a lot of consolidation and reused&#x2F;syndicated content.<p>If you don&#x27;t want to pay, just go to APnews.com. It&#x27;s where most smaller papers get their stories from anyway.
mtmail4 个月前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Blendle" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Blendle</a> tries but existed the German market. The wikipedia article is a bit outdated. One was able to search articles and then pay per article. If I recall 40-75 Euro cent. Then you downloaded a PDF file. I guess the news publishers insist on subscriptions.<p>With unifying subscriptions you&#x27;d compete against Apple News Plus and Google Play Newsstand. Companies with big pockets.
pwg4 个月前
&gt; Currently, it seems paid newspapers are developing their own solutions, meaning I have to subscribe to each one individually to read the news.<p>You&#x27;ve answered your own question right there.<p>Follow the money:<p>Actual subscriber: $X per month<p>Paywall clearing house setup: $X÷Y per month (where Y is the division ratio of your payment to the clearing house vs. the clearing house&#x27;s payment to the publisher) [1].<p>With $X being greater than $X÷Y, the publisher has an incentive to &quot;go their own way&quot; because they believe they will receive more revenue per reader that way.<p>[1] And the clearing house may even be worse, in that it may be some $X÷Z per read, where the Z divisor produces a value significantly smaller than $X per month.
评论 #42578170 未加载