Calling women 'household objects' now permitted on Facebook

I am all for <i>real</i> free speech about anything. It&#x27;s just never real free speech; it&#x27;s always censored and influenced (drowned out or amplified which is basically the same thing) in some direction. X is not free speech and this won&#x27;t be either.<p>What I do hope is that this will drive the banning of Meta, X and others from the EU. I know this will hurt a lot of people short term, but long term, we might be the only part of the world without a severe mental illness epidemic.

Good. I want to know who think on these lines. Helps me to pick better company.

I wonder what strange little people this rule was removed for. Sexism just stupefies me and I wonder how someone with the intelligence to breath could render such words.

I can understand simplifying moderation rules (making the less verbose, but by extension seemingly allowing some new things) but actually taking the time to spell out that these things are allowed, as the article alleges, seems bizarre.

[dupe] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42621627">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42621627</a>

What happened to Zuckerberg? I thought they were the Democrat side, they had to testify in congress about it, and now Musk bought out twitter and the Republicans won the elections. Is this a move to avoid getting facebook and instagram getting killed somehow by twitter and the republican government?

Asslicking the next admin to ban tiktok and create a moat.

Thank you CNN for bringing up creative ideas...

It’s not shame on any media making these article, it’s shame that there are people still reading this shitrag and similar shitrags.

This is outrage bait and pretty low even for CNN.

I just hope we can get past the era of people, and the media, being so outraged by everything.