TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Imaging mounted disk volumes under duress (2021)

77 点作者 yamrzou4 个月前

3 条评论

_carbyau_4 个月前
I know TheFineArticle is in Linux land but for Windows people with this issue you might look at Sysinternals Disk2vhd.[0]<p>It can be run from the online OS itself and it can store the resulting vhd on the same disk it is imaging (with space and disk performance constraints).<p>I find it handy for turning my freshly superceded gaming machine into a VM on my new machine for easy access to files, before doing whatever with my old hardware.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;learn.microsoft.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;sysinternals&#x2F;downloads&#x2F;disk2vhd" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;learn.microsoft.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;sysinternals&#x2F;downloads&#x2F;dis...</a>
评论 #42721563 未加载
评论 #42731533 未加载
honestSysAdmin4 个月前
Since the year 2007, my working assumption is that if data is not on ZFS on physically redundant media that the data has not been successfully saved. And, any machines that don&#x27;t have ZFS (some RedHat based boxes) should be configured only through Ansible and configured with the intention that all data (including syslogs) is either forwarded somewhere that does have ZFS or is accessed via NFS (backed by ZFS).<p>Or Ceph Bluestore, which does checksums on physically redundant media. We do N+3 replication because we&#x27;re lazy.
nyrikki4 个月前
FYI, while these block level methods do have a use case, parallel rsync and other file level tools are far safer and often faster with less additional load on the disk.<p>Duplicating the OS&#x2F;FS behavior hits the decidable problem and you just hope for the best with block level, often you won&#x27;t notice corruption either.
评论 #42716665 未加载
评论 #42723745 未加载