TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Company of One: Why Staying Small Is the Next Big Thing for Business

65 点作者 teleforce4 个月前

11 条评论

entropyneur4 个月前
Not only the article doesn&#x27;t answer the question in the title, it doesn&#x27;t even attempt to support the premise. Instead, it&#x27;s just a book ad.<p>As for staying small, how are you going to pay the politicians to enact regulations that cement your position in the market?
评论 #42703199 未加载
caspper694 个月前
Honestly, as I&#x27;ve gotten older, I just don&#x27;t have a lot of respect for companies that are simply chasing growth for the sake of growth and monetization just for the sake of monetization. I don&#x27;t think people realize when enough is actually <i>enough</i>.<p>I think one of the worst things a company can do is go public (outside of industries and niches that simply require large players). It just seems to ruin the quality of a company&#x27;s products, services &amp; culture.<p>I know we can&#x27;t all live in Mayberry, and that people don&#x27;t really pay for quality, but when your sole objective boils down to pleasing Wall St. quarter after quarter, something gets lost in the process.<p>Being a part of something that you take pride in used to mean something. Craftsmen and inventors weren&#x27;t necessarily looking for a seven figure exit (or more), or to become billionaires. They wanted to make the lives of their customers better.<p>I think we all suffer in different ways because of this growth-at-all-costs mentality, from the top all the way down.
评论 #42702083 未加载
评论 #42701188 未加载
评论 #42708684 未加载
taway1a2b3c4 个月前
Started a company with a partner 7 years ago. 2 person company, £1M ARR (took a while to get there). The best part is all the things we don&#x27;t have: Stand ups, backlog grooming, annual reviews, unnecessary meetings, HR department and all its associated asshattery. Hope this is the last &quot;job&quot; I ever need, I don&#x27;t think I can go back.
评论 #42703367 未加载
senko4 个月前
The book has some interesting ideas (which you&#x27;ll mostly be familiar with if you&#x27;re following the microisv&#x2F;indiehacker&#x2F;solopreneur communities), but stretches the &quot;company of one&quot; concept to breaking point, at some point invoking teams in facebook, etc. The term basically gets redefined as &quot;individuals, teams or orgs that the author likes&quot;.<p>A more descriptive title would be something like &quot;the minimalist entrepreneur&quot;, which is actually a title of another book on the same theme by Sahil Lavingia of Gumroad.<p>The book is full of interesting stories and presents a counterpoint to the &quot;default&quot; VC-backed growth-at-all-cost startup. If you haven&#x27;t been exposed to the indiehacker&#x2F;soloprenur ideas, a useful read even if you don&#x27;t take that route (same for Sahil&#x27;s book I mentioned).
AznHisoka4 个月前
I think companies (especially new ones like startups) with stay small, because they <i>have to</i>, not because they want to. They have to because it’s getting harder and harder to build something that will appeal to a wide market. The only alternative is to niche down as much as possible.<p>Which ultimately means smaller businesses
eappleby4 个月前
I&#x27;m on year 13 of running businesses of one (I built an audience development platform and an educational&#x2F;fundraising platform, plus a handful of smaller ones). On the plus side, I&#x27;d say that it has been pretty easy to maintain margins and keep cost under control. It&#x27;s also easy to stay under the radar of larger competitors. On the downside, I think acquisitions would have been easier if I had a team in place and higher revenue, even with lower operating margins. Last year, my revenue fell a bit and I&#x27;ve considered looking for a more traditional job, but it has been harder than I expected because I believe my experience may not fit a traditional job description. Still, if you can swing it, I would very much recommend it, but good to consider the downsides as well.
aakis4 个月前
The book’s thesis seems interesting: get more by focusing on doing quality work, launching and maintaining the right products, and factoring your lifestyle.<p>However, this article just misses the mark completely and starts arguing against “growing too fast” without specifying why. Made me not wanting to read it.
k__4 个月前
Profit&#x2F;person is the only metric that should grow.
nothercastle4 个月前
The article is crap but there is a known major hurdle scaling from 1-2 people with 1-2m in revenue to 10+ where it have to bring in administrative support people that aren’t being fully utilized that causes large profitability problems. I think the next major hurdle is scaling post about 60 people and then again past 350.<p>The military has this figured out and they organize accordingly.
nicksbg4 个月前
It really also depends on the country and lots of other factors.
bobheadmaker4 个月前
small businesses have that benefit!